Emmanuel Chamorey

7.5k citations
202 papers · 4.5k · h-index 36

Impact in

Papers in

Emmanuel Chamorey

192 papers receiving 4.4k citations

Peers

Emmanuel Chamorey
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
  • Otorhinolaryngology 549
  • Cancer Research 743
  • Oncology 1.3k
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 777
  • Surgery 787
Replace Brett Hughes with:
Brett Hughes Australia
N. Gopalakrishna Iyer Singapore
Mark C. Weissler United States
William N. William United States
Lars Bastholt Denmark
Esther Kim United States
Beth M. Beadle United States
Frederick L. Greene United States
Bhadrasain Vikram United States
Goura Kishor Rath India
Emmanuel Chamorey relative to Brett Hughes Australia Brett Hughes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Brett Hughes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emmanuel Chamorey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emmanuel Chamorey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emmanuel Chamorey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emmanuel Chamorey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emmanuel Chamorey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emmanuel Chamorey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emmanuel Chamorey. The network helps show where Emmanuel Chamorey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emmanuel Chamorey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emmanuel Chamorey Line = papers co-authored together Emmanuel Chamorey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 202 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008280
2 2007194
3 2017155
4 2002147
5 2013109
6 2006104
7 200797
8 201793
9 200789
10 201382
11 200873
12 200969
13 202168
14 201164
15 201161
16 200959
17 202258
18 201357
19 201156
20 201153

About Emmanuel Chamorey

Emmanuel Chamorey is a scholar working on Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Otorhinolaryngology, Cancer Research and Surgery, having authored 202 papers that have together received 4.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Head and Neck Cancer Studies (30 papers), Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (15 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (14 papers), Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (11 papers), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (10 papers), Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (10 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (10 papers) and Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (549 citations), Cancer Research (743 citations), Oncology (1.3k citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (777 citations) and Surgery (787 citations). Emmanuel Chamorey has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include O. Dassonville, Alexandre Bozec, Gilles Poissonnet, F Démard, Karen Bénézery, F. Ettore, Jean-­Marc Ferrero, Frédéric Peyrade, Jean‐Michel Hannoun‐Lévi and Anne Sudaka. Their work appears in journals such as European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Annals of Oncology, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics and Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact