Frédéric Ehrler

80 papers receiving 836 citations

Peers

Frédéric Ehrler
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Health Information Management 43
  • Emergency Medicine 79
  • Applied Psychology 38
  • Health Informatics 11
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 8
Replace Mustafa Ozkaynak with:
Mustafa Ozkaynak United States
Jeffrey M. Taekman United States
Jessica M. Ray United States
Masako Kanai‐Pak Japan
Kerry McGuire United States
Astrid Mayer United Kingdom
Jenna L. Marquard United States
Marcelo A. Lopetegui United States
Mehrdad Farzandipour Iran
Stephan A. Gaehde United States
Frédéric Ehrler relative to Mustafa Ozkaynak United States Mustafa Ozkaynak's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Mustafa Ozkaynak · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frédéric Ehrler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frédéric Ehrler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frédéric Ehrler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frédéric Ehrler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frédéric Ehrler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frédéric Ehrler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frédéric Ehrler. The network helps show where Frédéric Ehrler may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frédéric Ehrler, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frédéric Ehrler Line = papers co-authored together Frédéric Ehrler links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 87 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200871
2 201758
3 201955
4 201937
5 201735
6 201933
7 201631
8
Report on the TREC 2005 Experiment: Genomics Track.
200429
9 200529
10 201827
11 201426
12 202126
13 201825
14
Vocabulary-Driven Passage Retrieval for Question-Answering in Genomics.
200719
15 202018
16 202015
17 201915
18 201315
19 201714
20 202114

About Frédéric Ehrler

Frédéric Ehrler is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Applied Psychology, Health Information Management, Emergency Medicine and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 87 papers that have together received 874 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (22 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (10 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (8 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (6 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (5 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (4 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (4 papers) and Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Information Management (43 citations), Emergency Medicine (79 citations), Applied Psychology (38 citations), Health Informatics (11 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (8 citations). Frédéric Ehrler has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Christian Lovis, Johan Nicolas Siebert, Katherine Blondon, Sergio Manzano, Patrick Ruch, Alain Gervaix, Margot Mütsch, Vasileios Nittas, Laurence Lacroix and Antoine Geissbühler. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medical Internet Research, JMIR mhealth and uhealth, Trials, BMC Bioinformatics and BMJ Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact