Frédéric Ehrler

73 papers receiving 674 citations

Peers

Frédéric Ehrler
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Health Information Management 40
  • Emergency Medicine 67
  • Health Informatics 9
  • Applied Psychology 32
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 7
Replace Stephan A. Gaehde with:
Stephan A. Gaehde United States
Mustafa Ozkaynak United States
Jeffrey M. Taekman United States
Mehrdad Farzandipour Iran
Stan Kachnowski India
Baria Hafeez United States
Conceição Granja Norway
Connie Chan United States
Jenna L. Marquard United States
Huibert Tange Netherlands
Frédéric Ehrler relative to Stephan A. Gaehde United States Stephan A. Gaehde's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Stephan A. Gaehde · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frédéric Ehrler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frédéric Ehrler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frédéric Ehrler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frédéric Ehrler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frédéric Ehrler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frédéric Ehrler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frédéric Ehrler. The network helps show where Frédéric Ehrler may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frédéric Ehrler, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frédéric Ehrler Line = papers co-authored together Frédéric Ehrler links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 80 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201756
2 201950
3 201934
4 201933
5 201733
6 201630
7 201827
8 201826
9 200526
10
Report on the TREC 2005 Experiment: Genomics Track.
200425
11 201420
12
Vocabulary-Driven Passage Retrieval for Question-Answering in Genomics.
200718
13 202017
14 201315
15 201914
16 202113
17 202012
18 202012
19 200812
20 201511

About Frédéric Ehrler

Frédéric Ehrler is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Applied Psychology, Molecular Biology, Health Information Management and Emergency Medicine, having authored 80 papers that have together received 698 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (22 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (9 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (7 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (6 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (4 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (4 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (4 papers) and Emergency and Acute Care Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Information Management (40 citations), Emergency Medicine (67 citations), Health Informatics (9 citations), Applied Psychology (32 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (7 citations). Frédéric Ehrler has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Christian Lovis, Johan N Siebert, Katherine Blondon, Sergio Manzano, Alain Gervaix, Patrick Ruch, Vasileios Nittas, Margot Mütsch, Laurence Lacroix and Antoine Geissbühler. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medical Internet Research, JMIR mhealth and uhealth, Trials, BMC Bioinformatics and Journal of Personalized Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact