Frédéric Bouder

42 papers receiving 489 citations

Peers

Frédéric Bouder
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Health 79
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 30
  • Sociology and Political Science 233
  • Pharmacology 35
  • Communication 30
Replace Germán Velásquez with:
Germán Velásquez Switzerland
Grazia Orizio Italy
Rebecca Forman United Kingdom
Roger A. Atinga Ghana
Patrick Fafard Canada
Trevor Peckham United States
Seyed Fahim Irandoost Iran
Michelle Falkenbach United States
Govin Permanand Denmark
Jingyi Xiao China
Frédéric Bouder relative to Germán Velásquez Switzerland Germán Velásquez's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.5×
Germán Velásquez · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frédéric Bouder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frédéric Bouder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frédéric Bouder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frédéric Bouder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frédéric Bouder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frédéric Bouder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frédéric Bouder. The network helps show where Frédéric Bouder may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frédéric Bouder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frédéric Bouder Line = papers co-authored together Frédéric Bouder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202075
2 201167
3 201546
4 201637
5 201732
6 200828
7 201923
8 201722
9 201621
10 201621
11 201517
12 201211
13 201910
14
Benefit/ris k communication by the European Medicines Agency: a study of influential stakeholders' expectations and attitudes
201110
15 20159
16 20138
17 20168
18 20226
19 20225
20 20215

About Frédéric Bouder

Frédéric Bouder is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Pharmacology, Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 45 papers that have together received 524 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Risk Perception and Management (24 papers), Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare (7 papers), Disaster Management and Resilience (5 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers), Regulation and Compliance Studies (4 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (4 papers), Risk and Safety Analysis (3 papers) and Environmental and Social Impact Assessments (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (79 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (30 citations), Sociology and Political Science (233 citations), Pharmacology (35 citations) and Communication (30 citations). Frédéric Bouder has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Ragnar E. Löfstedt, Terje Aven, Darrick Evensen, Jamie K. Wardman, Regine Paul, Lea Seeber, Gerhard Gaedicke, David Demeritt, Henry Rothstein and Sonali Kochhar. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Risk Research, International Journal of Public Health, Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology, European Journal of Risk Regulation and Risk Analysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact