Fred E. Samson

35 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Fred E. Samson
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 443
  • Developmental Neuroscience 65
  • Neurology 71
  • Cell Biology 136
  • Pharmacology 126
Replace Thomas L. Pazdernik with:
Thomas L. Pazdernik United States
Jonathan E. Friedman United States
Tsuneo Takadera Japan
Herbert E. Lowndes United States
Hugh E. Laird United States
F. E. Samson United States
A.P. Carvalho Portugal
OTTAVIO BARNABEI Italy
Hans Herken Germany
Marc Ledig France
Fred E. Samson relative to Thomas L. Pazdernik United States Thomas L. Pazdernik's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Thomas L. Pazdernik · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fred E. Samson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fred E. Samson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fred E. Samson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fred E. Samson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fred E. Samson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fred E. Samson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fred E. Samson. The network helps show where Fred E. Samson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fred E. Samson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fred E. Samson Line = papers co-authored together Fred E. Samson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Action of the vinca alkaloids vincristine, vinblastine, and desacetyl vinblastine amide on microtubules in vitro.
1976177
2 1987133
3 199371
4 197769
5 198064
6 197757
7 198256
8 199954
9 199249
10 198449
11 198240
12 197834
13 198832
14 199931
15 197729
16 197424
17 198223
18 199621
19 197520
20 200317

About Fred E. Samson

Fred E. Samson is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Neurology, Cell Biology, Developmental Neuroscience and Molecular Biology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (14 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (4 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (4 papers), Infectious Encephalopathies and Encephalitis (3 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (3 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (3 papers), Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity (3 papers) and Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (443 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (65 citations), Neurology (71 citations), Cell Biology (136 citations) and Pharmacology (126 citations). Fred E. Samson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Stanley R. Nelson, Thomas L. Pazdernik, Richard H. Himes, Merrill Tarr, John V. Wade, J. Alejandro Donoso, Louis S. Green, Robert S. Cross, Matthew E. Layton and Mitchell R. Emerson. Their work appears in journals such as Brain Research, Neurochemical Research, Anesthesiology, Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology and Neurotoxicity Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact