Frauke Hellwig

823 citations
11 papers · 576 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Frauke Hellwig

11 papers receiving 556 citations

Peers

Frauke Hellwig
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 366
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 399
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 138
  • Statistics and Probability 41
  • Language and Linguistics 43
Replace Samantha F. McCormick with:
Samantha F. McCormick United Kingdom
Dianne Bradley Australia
Alberto Domı́nguez Spain
Janet I. Vousden United Kingdom
Cécile Beauvillain France
M. Louise Kelly United Kingdom
Rihana S. Williams United States
Simona Amenta Italy
Sid Kouider France
David Braze United States
Frauke Hellwig relative to Samantha F. McCormick United Kingdom Samantha F. McCormick's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Samantha F. McCormick · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frauke Hellwig

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frauke Hellwig's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frauke Hellwig with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frauke Hellwig more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frauke Hellwig

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frauke Hellwig. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frauke Hellwig. The network helps show where Frauke Hellwig may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Frauke Hellwig, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frauke Hellwig Line = papers co-authored together Frauke Hellwig links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2001135
2 200493
3 200386
4 200578
5 199375
6 200442
7 200534
8 201415
9 201212
10
The interplay between meaning and syntax in language production
20045
11 20001

About Frauke Hellwig

Frauke Hellwig is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Artificial Intelligence and Language and Linguistics, having authored 11 papers that have together received 576 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (7 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (4 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (4 papers), Language Development and Disorders (2 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (2 papers), Categorization, perception, and language (2 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (1 paper) and Natural Language Processing Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (366 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (399 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (138 citations), Statistics and Probability (41 citations) and Language and Linguistics (43 citations). Frauke Hellwig has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Peter Indefrey, Annette M.B. de Groot, Peter Hagoort, Rüdiger J. Seitz, Hans Herzog, R. Harald Baayen, U. Frauenfelder, Katrin Amunts, Colin Brown and Anja Ischebeck. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Memory and Language, Written Language & Literacy, Reading and Writing, Brain and Language and Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact