Frank Schügner
Impact in
- Biomaterials top 5%
- Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
-
- Nerve injury and regeneration
Papers in
-
- Nerve injury and regeneration 6
- Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling 2
- Neuroscience and Neural Engineering 1
- Surgery 4
- Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine 3
- Co-authors
- I. Heschel (5 shared papers)Ahmet Bozkurt (6 shared papers)Gary A. Brook (6 shared papers)H. Reul (1 shared paper)Jörn Apel (1 shared paper)Reinhard Paul (1 shared paper)Sebastian Klaus (1 shared paper)Ronald Deumens (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- Biomaterials (2 papers)Brain Research (1 paper)Artificial Organs (1 paper)Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine (1 paper)Tissue Engineering (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyNetherlandsBelgium
In The Last Decade
Frank Schügner
9 papers receiving 898 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Biomaterials 306
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 402
- Developmental Neuroscience 54
- Biomedical Engineering 415
- Surgery 340
Countries citing papers authored by Frank Schügner
This map shows the geographic impact of Frank Schügner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frank Schügner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frank Schügner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Frank Schügner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frank Schügner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frank Schügner. The network helps show where Frank Schügner may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frank Schügner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 230 | |
| 2 | 2008 | 133 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 130 | |
| 4 | 2008 | 119 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 112 | |
| 6 | 2008 | 81 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 50 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 34 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 27 |
About Frank Schügner
Frank Schügner is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Surgery, Biomaterials, Molecular Biology and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 9 papers that have together received 916 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nerve injury and regeneration (6 papers), Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (3 papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (3 papers), Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling (2 papers), Blood properties and coagulation (1 paper), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (1 paper), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (1 paper) and Muscle Physiology and Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biomaterials (306 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (402 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (54 citations), Biomedical Engineering (415 citations) and Surgery (340 citations). Frank Schügner has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include I. Heschel, Ahmet Bozkurt, Gary A. Brook, H. Reul, Jörn Apel, Reinhard Paul, Sebastian Klaus, Ronald Deumens, Norbert Pallua and Joachim Weis. Their work appears in journals such as Biomaterials, Brain Research, Artificial Organs, Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine and Tissue Engineering.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.