Dan mon O’Dey

706 citations
30 papers · 532 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Dan mon O’Dey

27 papers receiving 502 citations

Peers

Dan mon O’Dey
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 225
  • Rehabilitation 51
  • Biomaterials 105
  • Developmental Neuroscience 28
  • Surgery 258
Replace Jon Ver Halen with:
Jon Ver Halen United States
M.H. Spilker United States
Francesco Stagno d’Alcontres Italy
Jorge Rodrigues Portugal
Hajime Matsumine Japan
Pietro G. di Summa Switzerland
Vaishali B. Doolabh United States
Thomas Holzbach Germany
Yangbin Xu China
Yuan‐Yu Hsueh Taiwan
Dan mon O’Dey relative to Jon Ver Halen United States Jon Ver Halen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Jon Ver Halen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dan mon O’Dey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dan mon O’Dey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan mon O’Dey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan mon O’Dey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dan mon O’Dey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan mon O’Dey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan mon O’Dey. The network helps show where Dan mon O’Dey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dan mon O’Dey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dan mon O’Dey Line = papers co-authored together Dan mon O’Dey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011126
2 200872
3 201054
4 200853
5 201027
6 201226
7 200424
8 201022
9 201318
10 201417
11 201116
12 201711
13 20179
14 20088
15 20188
16 20107
17 20006
18 20106
19 20084
20 20064

About Dan mon O’Dey

Dan mon O’Dey is a scholar working on Surgery, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Epidemiology and Rheumatology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 532 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues (8 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (6 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (5 papers), Genital Health and Disease (5 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (5 papers), Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (5 papers), Peripheral Nerve Disorders (3 papers) and Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (225 citations), Rehabilitation (51 citations), Biomaterials (105 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (28 citations) and Surgery (258 citations). Dan mon O’Dey has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Norbert Pallua, Ahmet Bozkurt, Gary A. Brook, Ahmet Bozkurt, Ronald Deumens, Christoph V. Suschek, Andreas Gröger, Andreas Prescher, Paul C. Fuchs and Joachim Weis. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Gynecologic Oncology, Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery and Burns.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact