Flávia Mayer

26 papers receiving 488 citations

Peers

Flávia Mayer
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 99
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 17
  • Speech and Hearing 24
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 44
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 11
Replace Laura Vernuccio with:
Laura Vernuccio Italy
Giuseppe Cicala Italy
Rongrong Yang China
Robin Flaig United Kingdom
L McIntyre United Kingdom
Arseniy Yashkin United States
Benjumin Hsu Australia
Maureen van den Donk Netherlands
Jennifer L. Rodgers United States
Astrid Y. Bijlsma Netherlands
Flávia Mayer relative to Laura Vernuccio Italy Laura Vernuccio's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.7×
Laura Vernuccio · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Flávia Mayer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Flávia Mayer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Flávia Mayer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Flávia Mayer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Flávia Mayer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Flávia Mayer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Flávia Mayer. The network helps show where Flávia Mayer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Flávia Mayer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Flávia Mayer Line = papers co-authored together Flávia Mayer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201881
2 201837
3 201635
4 201834
5 202029
6 201429
7 201829
8 201327
9 201926
10 201721
11 202119
12 201719
13 201917
14 202016
15 201816
16 202110
17 20179
18 20168
19 20197
20 20197

About Flávia Mayer

Flávia Mayer is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 28 papers that have together received 499 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (6 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (3 papers), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (2 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (2 papers), Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments (1 paper), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (1 paper) and Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (99 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (17 citations), Speech and Hearing (24 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (44 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (11 citations). Flávia Mayer has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and Armenia. Frequent co-authors include Nicola Vanacore, Eleonora Lacorte, Ilaria Bacigalupo, Marco Canevelli, Alessandra Di Pucchio, Teresa Di Fiandra, Marina Davoli, Nera Agabiti, Francesco Trotta and Antonio Addis. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Alzheimer s Disease, Neurological Sciences, BMJ Open, BMC Public Health and BioDrugs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact