Fiona Mapp

417 citations
21 papers · 181 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Fiona Mapp

20 papers receiving 177 citations

Peers

Fiona Mapp
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Microbiology 36
  • General Health Professions 105
  • Infectious Diseases 75
  • Applied Psychology 12
  • Health 16
Replace Brent Mackie with:
Brent Mackie Australia
Alison Howarth United Kingdom
Shana D. Hughes United States
Bintou Dembélé Keïta France
Busi Nkala South Africa
KA Fenton United Kingdom
David Stephens United States
F Dubois-Arber Switzerland
Laura V. Lloyd United States
Penny Goold United Kingdom
Fiona Mapp relative to Brent Mackie Australia Brent Mackie's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Brent Mackie · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fiona Mapp

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fiona Mapp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fiona Mapp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fiona Mapp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fiona Mapp

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fiona Mapp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fiona Mapp. The network helps show where Fiona Mapp may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fiona Mapp, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fiona Mapp Line = papers co-authored together Fiona Mapp links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201741
2 201830
3 201717
4 202115
5 201515
6 202112
7 20169
8 20197
9 20147
10 20226
11 20225
12 20224
13 20174
14 20252
15 20172
16 20231
17 20171
18 20191
19 20171
20 20161

About Fiona Mapp

Fiona Mapp is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Infectious Diseases, Applied Psychology, Microbiology and Health, having authored 21 papers that have together received 181 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (8 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (5 papers), Reproductive tract infections research (4 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (3 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (3 papers), Community Health and Development (2 papers) and Sex work and related issues (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (36 citations), General Health Professions (105 citations), Infectious Diseases (75 citations), Applied Psychology (12 citations) and Health (16 citations). Fiona Mapp has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Catherine H Mercer, Soazig Clifton, Clare Tanton, Margaret Johnson, Pam Sonnenberg, Nigel Field, Kaye Wellings, Ford Hickson, Gwenda Hughes and Jackie Cassell. Their work appears in journals such as Sexually Transmitted Infections, British Journal of Health Psychology, BMJ Open, International Journal of STD & AIDS and BMC Health Services Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact