David Stephens

19 papers receiving 247 citations

Peers

David Stephens
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Applied Psychology 52
  • Microbiology 42
  • General Health Professions 111
  • Health 34
  • Clinical Psychology 39
Replace Lynne Jordan with:
Lynne Jordan Australia
Diane S. Saint-Victor United States
Simegnew Handebo Ethiopia
Shana D. Hughes United States
Ava Lena Waldman United States
Fiona Mapp United Kingdom
Dominique Hausser Switzerland
F Dubois-Arber Switzerland
Laura V. Lloyd United States
Marília Greco Brazil
David Stephens relative to Lynne Jordan Australia Lynne Jordan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Lynne Jordan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Stephens

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Stephens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Stephens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Stephens more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Stephens

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Stephens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Stephens. The network helps show where David Stephens may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Stephens, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Stephens Line = papers co-authored together David Stephens links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 201152
2 199249
3
Subclinical vitamin A deficiency: a potentially unrecognized problem in the United States.
199726
4 202121
5 202017
6 201715
7 201815
8 201814
9 201913
10 202011
11 20218
12 20216
13 20224
14
What men worry about: the place of HIV/AIDS and STDs in health concerns among Turkish, second-generation Greek, Chilean, Vietnamese and Anglo-Australian men
19994
15 20184
16
Conflict and consensus: HIV/AIDS and human rights in Asia and the Pacific.
19983
17 20163
18 20222
19 20201

About David Stephens

David Stephens is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Applied Psychology, Education and Epidemiology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 268 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (6 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (5 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (4 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (4 papers), Hepatitis C virus research (3 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Liver Disease and Transplantation (2 papers) and Community Health and Development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (52 citations), Microbiology (42 citations), General Health Professions (111 citations), Health (34 citations) and Clinical Psychology (39 citations). David Stephens has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Stephanie Craig Rushing, Patricia L. Jackson, Michael D. Decker, Kathryn M. Edwards, Scott A. Halperin, Bárbara Miller, Allyson Kelley, Roger Tory Peterson, Bradley Kerr and Megan A. Moreno. Their work appears in journals such as JMIR Mental Health, Journal of Adolescent Health, American Indian and Alaska Native Mental Health Research, The Journal of Pediatrics and The Journal of Rural Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact