Filipa Novais

38 papers receiving 272 citations

Peers

Filipa Novais
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Biological Psychiatry 21
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 61
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 10
  • Clinical Psychology 45
  • Leadership and Management 2
Replace Zhengui Yang with:
Zhengui Yang China
Aldo Alberto Conti United Kingdom
Salma Rose Imanari Ribeiz Brazil
Caroline P. Nguyen United States
Alexander Kibitov Russia
Mathew Chiang United States
Alexander Kaltenboeck Austria
Asuka Yoshimi Japan
Jack C. Lennon United States
Meghan A. Collins United States
Filipa Novais relative to Zhengui Yang China Zhengui Yang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Zhengui Yang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Filipa Novais

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Filipa Novais's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Filipa Novais with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Filipa Novais more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Filipa Novais

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Filipa Novais. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Filipa Novais. The network helps show where Filipa Novais may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Filipa Novais, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Filipa Novais Line = papers co-authored together Filipa Novais links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201570
2 202435
3 201521
4 202414
5 202112
6 202211
7 20198
8 20188
9 20238
10 20228
11 20217
12 20227
13 20217
14 20236
15 20155
16 20215
17 20195
18 20225
19 20215
20 20194

About Filipa Novais

Filipa Novais is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Biological Psychiatry, Clinical Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 42 papers that have together received 283 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health Research Topics (6 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (5 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (4 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (4 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (4 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (4 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (3 papers) and Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (21 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (61 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (10 citations), Clinical Psychology (45 citations) and Leadership and Management (2 citations). Filipa Novais has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Brazil and Australia. Frequent co-authors include SERGIO E. STARKSTEIN, Diogo Telles‐Correia, Pedro Oliveira, Jorge Sinval, José Cortez Pimentel, Maria Luísa Figueira, Miguel S. Barbosa, Licínia Ganança, Alice Delerue Matos and Sergio Eduardo de Carvalho Machado. Their work appears in journals such as Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry, Epilepsy & Behavior, European Psychiatry, Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry and Journal of Affective Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact