Fernando Mateo

55 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Fernando Mateo
Comparison fields: 5 of 144
  • Plant Science 610
  • Food Science 206
  • Analytical Chemistry 98
  • Radiation 81
  • Cell Biology 147
Replace Liping Chen with:
Liping Chen China
Mirwaes Wahabzada Germany
Daniel E. Guyer United States
Knut Kvaal Norway
Jinfan Xu China
Yuzhen Lu United States
Fernando Mendoza United States
Junfeng Gao China
J.M. Prats-Montalbán Spain
Fernando Mateo relative to Liping Chen China Liping Chen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Liping Chen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fernando Mateo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fernando Mateo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fernando Mateo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fernando Mateo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fernando Mateo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fernando Mateo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fernando Mateo. The network helps show where Fernando Mateo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fernando Mateo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fernando Mateo Line = papers co-authored together Fernando Mateo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016198
2 2007156
3 200687
4 200972
5 201261
6 202052
7 202245
8 200943
9 201040
10 201938
11 201936
12 200833
13 200832
14 200629
15 200929
16 202027
17 201826
18 202126
19 202125
20 200922

About Fernando Mateo

Fernando Mateo is a scholar working on Plant Science, Artificial Intelligence, Food Science, Radiation and Cell Biology, having authored 55 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food (19 papers), Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies (9 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (9 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (7 papers), Neural Networks and Applications (5 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (5 papers), Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology (4 papers) and Nuclear Physics and Applications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (610 citations), Food Science (206 citations), Analytical Chemistry (98 citations), Radiation (81 citations) and Cell Biology (147 citations). Fernando Mateo has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Italy and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Misericordia Jiménez, Eva M. Mateo, Ángel Medina, Andrea Tarazona, R. Mateo, F.M. Valle-Algarra, José V. Gómez, José Gómez‐Dans, Jordi Muñoz-Marı́ and Gustau Camps‐Valls. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Food Microbiology, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment, Toxins, Food Control and Applied Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact