Fernando Hellmann

25 papers receiving 204 citations

Peers

Fernando Hellmann
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Complementary and Manual Therapy 7
  • Health 23
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 20
  • General Health Professions 48
  • Pharmacy 6
Replace Eugena Stamuli with:
Eugena Stamuli United Kingdom
Malakai Ofanoa New Zealand
Nadia N. Khan Australia
Merry Jo Thoele United States
Medhat K. El-Shazly Egypt
Florence Parent Belgium
David J. Satin United States
Cristian Roncada Brazil
Ray Baser United States
Michael D. Rozier United States
Fernando Hellmann relative to Eugena Stamuli United Kingdom Eugena Stamuli's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.9×
Eugena Stamuli · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fernando Hellmann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fernando Hellmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fernando Hellmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fernando Hellmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fernando Hellmann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fernando Hellmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fernando Hellmann. The network helps show where Fernando Hellmann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fernando Hellmann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fernando Hellmann Line = papers co-authored together Fernando Hellmann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201487
2 202022
3 201717
4 202115
5 201810
6 20219
7 20229
8 20157
9 20226
10 20154
11 20234
12
A NATUROLOGIA E A INTERFACE COM AS RACIONALIDADES MÉDICAS
20113
13 19693
14 20213
15 20163
16 20223
17 20142
18 20182
19 20242
20 20221

About Fernando Hellmann

Fernando Hellmann is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Sociology and Political Science and Complementary and alternative medicine, having authored 38 papers that have together received 220 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in Clinical Research (9 papers), Ethics in medical practice (8 papers), Public Health in Brazil (6 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (5 papers), Ethics and bioethics in healthcare (4 papers), Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport (3 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (3 papers) and Physical Education and Pedagogy (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and Manual Therapy (7 citations), Health (23 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (20 citations), General Health Professions (48 citations) and Pharmacy (6 citations). Fernando Hellmann has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Marta Inêz Machado Verdi, Sandra Noemi Caponi, Volnei Garrafa, Núria Homedes, Bryn Williams–Jones, Thiago Rocha da Cunha, Mirelle Finkler, Denise Elvira Pires de Pires, Silvana Nair Leite and Mara Ambrosina de Oliveira Vargas. Their work appears in journals such as Archives of Medical Research, Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, Developing World Bioethics, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine and Cadernos de Saúde Pública.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact