Fernando Bronet

1.0k citations
31 papers · 792 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Fernando Bronet

30 papers receiving 740 citations

Peers

Fernando Bronet
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Reproductive Medicine 216
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 338
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 433
  • Genetics 76
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 15
Replace Natalia Basile with:
Natalia Basile Spain
Cristina Lagalla Italy
Alessandra Ruberti Italy
Natalie A. Cekleniak United States
Anna Carby United Kingdom
Carlijn Vergouw Netherlands
Agnese Fiorentino Italy
Daria Maria Soscia Italy
Mònica Parriego Spain
Silvia Colamaria Italy
Fernando Bronet relative to Natalia Basile Spain Natalia Basile's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×
Natalia Basile · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fernando Bronet

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fernando Bronet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fernando Bronet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fernando Bronet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fernando Bronet

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fernando Bronet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fernando Bronet. The network helps show where Fernando Bronet may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fernando Bronet, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fernando Bronet Line = papers co-authored together Fernando Bronet links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014150
2 2020102
3 201390
4 201672
5 201251
6 202048
7 201647
8 201939
9 202338
10 201436
11 200936
12 202117
13 201417
14 202210
15 20239
16 20144
17 20123
18 20113
19 20173
20 20123

About Fernando Bronet

Fernando Bronet is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Reproductive Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Genetics and Aging, having authored 31 papers that have together received 792 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Biology and Fertility (14 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (11 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (5 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (4 papers), Ovarian function and disorders (4 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (3 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (2 papers) and Renal and related cancers (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (216 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (338 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (433 citations), Genetics (76 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (15 citations). Fernando Bronet has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Portugal and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Juan Antonio García-Velasco, Marcos Meseguer, Natalia Basile, Lorena Rodrigo, Mireia Florensa, Dean E. Morbeck, Martine De Rycke, Veerle Goossens, Alberto Pacheco and Carmen Rubio. Their work appears in journals such as Fertility and Sterility, Human Reproduction, Reproductive BioMedicine Online, Journal of Clinical Medicine and Reproduction.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact