Fernando Bronet

1.0k citations
27 papers · 716 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Fernando Bronet

26 papers receiving 694 citations

Peers

Fernando Bronet
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Reproductive Medicine 184
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 308
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 390
  • Genetics 72
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 15
Replace Natalia Basile with:
Natalia Basile Spain
Cristina Lagalla Italy
Céline Bruno France
Daria Soscia Italy
N. Cekleniak United States
Julie Barberet France
Shala A Salem United States
Alessandra Ruberti Italy
A. Fiorentino Italy
John Garrisi United States
Fernando Bronet relative to Natalia Basile Spain Natalia Basile's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Natalia Basile · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fernando Bronet

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fernando Bronet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fernando Bronet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fernando Bronet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fernando Bronet

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fernando Bronet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fernando Bronet. The network helps show where Fernando Bronet may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fernando Bronet, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fernando Bronet Line = papers co-authored together Fernando Bronet links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014143
2 202094
3 201386
4 201667
5 201246
6 202041
7 201640
8 201938
9 200934
10 201433
11 202329
12 202116
13 201413
14 202210
15 20239
16 20173
17 20143
18 20222
19 20132
20 20211

About Fernando Bronet

Fernando Bronet is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Reproductive Medicine, Molecular Biology and Genetics, having authored 27 papers that have together received 716 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (13 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (13 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (5 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (3 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (3 papers), Ovarian function and disorders (2 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (2 papers) and Renal and related cancers (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (184 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (308 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (390 citations), Genetics (72 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (15 citations). Fernando Bronet has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Portugal and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Juan A. García-Velasco, Marcos Meseguer, Natalia Basile, Lorena Rodrigo, M. Florensa, Dean E. Morbeck, Martine De Rycke, V. Goossens, Alberto Pacheco and Carmen Rubio. Their work appears in journals such as Fertility and Sterility, Reproductive BioMedicine Online, Human Reproduction, Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology and Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact