Fernando Borráz

34 papers receiving 319 citations

Peers

Fernando Borráz
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Safety Research 74
  • Business and International Management 14
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 57
  • Economics and Econometrics 147
  • Development 14
Replace Toseef Azid with:
Toseef Azid Saudi Arabia
Jaime Saavedra United States
Najy Benhassine United States
Harsha Aturupane United States
Ilker Kaya United Arab Emirates
William Baah‐Boateng Ghana
Amartya Sen
Kartik Roy Australia
Judith Möllers Germany
Samuel M. Wangwe Tanzania
Fernando Borráz relative to Toseef Azid Saudi Arabia Toseef Azid's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Toseef Azid · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fernando Borráz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fernando Borráz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fernando Borráz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fernando Borráz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fernando Borráz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fernando Borráz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fernando Borráz. The network helps show where Fernando Borráz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Fernando Borráz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fernando Borráz Line = papers co-authored together Fernando Borráz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200569
2 200945
3 200731
4 201429
5 201627
6 201522
7 201320
8 197016
9 201311
10 200810
11 201310
12 20199
13 20129
14 20178
15 20125
16 20125
17 20104
18
Has globalization deepened income inequality in Mexico
20054
19 20134
20
Inattention, Disagreement and Internal (In)Consistency of Inflation Forecasts
20183

About Fernando Borráz

Fernando Borráz is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Sociology and Political Science, Safety Research and Marketing, having authored 40 papers that have together received 364 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Income, Poverty, and Inequality (8 papers), Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets (8 papers), Global trade and economics (8 papers), Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (7 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (6 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (6 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (5 papers) and Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (74 citations), Business and International Management (14 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (57 citations), Economics and Econometrics (147 citations) and Development (14 citations). Fernando Borráz has collaborated with scholars based in Uruguay, Spain and United States. Frequent co-authors include Máximo Rossi, J. Ernesto López-Córdova, Daniel Ferrés, José Ernesto Amorós, Susan Pozo, Roberto Rigobón, Alberto Cavallo, Juan Dubra, Marcelo Olarreaga and Daniel M. Kammen. Their work appears in journals such as Global economy journal, Climate and Development, The World Bank Economic Review, Latin American Research Review and The Journal of Economic Inequality.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact