Fernanda Pires
Impact in
- Communication top 10%
- Social Media and Politics
- Communication and COVID-19 Impact
-
- Gender, Feminism, and Media
Papers in
-
- Social Media and Politics 11
-
- Impact of Technology on Adolescents 5
- Digital Games and Media 3
- Education and Digital Technologies 3
- Digital Economy and Work Transformation 3
- Co-authors
- María-José Masanet (7 shared papers)Carlos Alberto Scolari (3 shared papers)Débora Lanzeni (2 shared papers)Marcela Pessoa (5 shared papers)Luiz Claúdio Arraes de Alencar (1 shared paper)Rafael Grohmann (1 shared paper)Sílvia Amélia Bim (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Fernanda Pires
25 papers receiving 226 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Communication 75
- Gender Studies 32
- Sociology and Political Science 129
- Computer Science Applications 14
- Literature and Literary Theory 24
Countries citing papers authored by Fernanda Pires
This map shows the geographic impact of Fernanda Pires's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fernanda Pires with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fernanda Pires more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Fernanda Pires
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fernanda Pires. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fernanda Pires. The network helps show where Fernanda Pires may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Fernanda Pires, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 70 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 27 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 21 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 15 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 11 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2024 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 7 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 7 | |
| 14 | The Co-viewing 2.0: detaching from history and applying in the new media age | 2015 | 6 |
| 15 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 17 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2020 | 2 |
About Fernanda Pires
Fernanda Pires is a scholar working on Communication, Sociology and Political Science, Computer Science Applications, Gender Studies and Philosophy, having authored 29 papers that have together received 237 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Media and Politics (11 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (5 papers), Media and Digital Communication (4 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (4 papers), Digital Games and Media (3 papers), Education and Digital Technologies (3 papers), Digital Economy and Work Transformation (3 papers) and Teaching and Learning Programming (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (75 citations), Gender Studies (32 citations), Sociology and Political Science (129 citations), Computer Science Applications (14 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (24 citations). Fernanda Pires has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Brazil and Australia. Frequent co-authors include María-José Masanet, Carlos Alberto Scolari, Débora Lanzeni, Marcela Pessoa, Luiz Claúdio Arraes de Alencar, Rafael Grohmann and Sílvia Amélia Bim. Their work appears in journals such as Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, Information Communication & Society, Poetics, El Profesional de la Informacion and Memory Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.