This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Memory Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Memory Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Memory Studies more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Memory Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Memory Studies.
About Memory Studies
The 854 papers published in Memory Studies in the last decades have received a total of 9.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Memory Studies usually cover Social Psychology (521 papers), Museology (47 papers), Anthropology (129 papers), History (138 papers) and Cultural Studies (99 papers) specifically the topics of Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration (481 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (75 papers), Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (64 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (61 papers), Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation (60 papers), Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (53 papers), Rhetoric and Communication Studies (53 papers) and Balkans: History, Politics, Society (52 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Memory Studies are Paul Connerton, Karen M. Douglas, Jan‐Willem van Prooijen, Ann Rigney, Andrew Hoskins, Robyn Fıvush, Barbie Zelizer, José van Dijck, Marita Sturken and Annette Kühn.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.