Fernanda Mata

522 citations
18 papers · 405 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Fernanda Mata

18 papers receiving 379 citations

Peers

Fernanda Mata
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Clinical Psychology 153
  • Applied Psychology 30
  • General Decision Sciences 10
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 100
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 59
Replace Abbe G. Boeka with:
Abbe G. Boeka United States
Mary Hauser United States
Andrea J. Weinstein United States
Martien G.S. Schrooten Sweden
Kristina Dushaj United States
Joseph S. Baschnagel United States
Selin Neseliler Canada
Julie Karsten Netherlands
Alexandra F. Muratore United States
Katherine H. Frost United States
Fernanda Mata relative to Abbe G. Boeka United States Abbe G. Boeka's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.6×
Abbe G. Boeka · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fernanda Mata

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fernanda Mata's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fernanda Mata with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fernanda Mata more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fernanda Mata

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fernanda Mata. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fernanda Mata. The network helps show where Fernanda Mata may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fernanda Mata, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fernanda Mata Line = papers co-authored together Fernanda Mata links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 201873
2 201868
3 201657
4 201555
5 201725
6 201724
7 201122
8 202015
9 201314
10 201313
11 201310
12 20178
13 20167
14 20157
15 20174
16 20211
17 20081
18 20251

About Fernanda Mata

Fernanda Mata is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Physiology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 405 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (5 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (4 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (3 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers), Regulation of Appetite and Obesity (2 papers), Body Composition Measurement Techniques (1 paper) and Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (153 citations), Applied Psychology (30 citations), General Decision Sciences (10 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (100 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (59 citations). Fernanda Mata has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Brazil and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Antonio Verdejo‐García, Carles Soriano‐Mas, Rafael de la Torre, Laura Forcano, Juan Verdejo‐Román, Leandro Fernandes Malloy‐Diniz, Helen Truby, Murat Yücel, Débora Marques de Miranda and Leigh C. Ward. Their work appears in journals such as Appetite, Obesity, Frontiers in Psychology, Frontiers in Neuroscience and International Journal of Obesity.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact