Fernanda Mata

508 citations
17 papers · 355 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Fernanda Mata

16 papers receiving 347 citations

Peers

Fernanda Mata
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Clinical Psychology 141
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 117
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 67
  • Applied Psychology 26
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 63
Replace James T. Kennedy with:
James T. Kennedy United States
Abbe G. Boeka United States
Lydia Hellrung Germany
Xiaotong Li China
Erwan Codrons Italy
Sonja Übel Austria
Ozlem Korucuoglu United States
Alexandra F. Muratore United States
Marika Paaver Estonia
Lisette Charbonnier Netherlands
Fernanda Mata relative to James T. Kennedy United States James T. Kennedy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
James T. Kennedy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fernanda Mata

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fernanda Mata's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fernanda Mata with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fernanda Mata more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fernanda Mata

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fernanda Mata. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fernanda Mata. The network helps show where Fernanda Mata may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fernanda Mata, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fernanda Mata Line = papers co-authored together Fernanda Mata links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 201866
2 201656
3 201549
4 201847
5 201723
6 201122
7 201721
8 202014
9 201313
10 201312
11 201310
12 20177
13 20166
14 20155
15 20173
16 20081
17 20250

About Fernanda Mata

Fernanda Mata is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 17 papers that have together received 355 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (6 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (5 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (5 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (4 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (3 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers), Regulation of Appetite and Obesity (2 papers) and Educational and Psychological Assessments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (141 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (117 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (67 citations), Applied Psychology (26 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (63 citations). Fernanda Mata has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Brazil and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Antonio Verdejo‐García, Carles Soriano‐Mas, Juan Verdejo‐Román, Laura Forcano, Rafael de la Torre, Leandro Fernandes Malloy‐Diniz, Helen Truby, Alastair Kwok, Murat Yücel and Débora Marques de Miranda. Their work appears in journals such as Appetite, Nutrients, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, Frontiers in Psychology and Frontiers in Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact