Feng Wang

9.7k citations
303 papers · 8.0k · h-index 50

Impact in

Papers in

Feng Wang

281 papers receiving 7.8k citations

Peers

Feng Wang
Comparison fields: 5 of 185
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 1.5k
  • Biotechnology 524
  • Pollution 705
  • Plant Science 1.6k
  • Food Science 707
Replace Fang Zhang with:
Fang Zhang China
Ranjna Sirohi India
Rubens Maciel Filho Brazil
Roberto Parra‐Saldívar Mexico
Edgard Gnansounou Switzerland
Tahir Rasheed China
Pradeep Verma India
Seung Wook Kim South Korea
Shahin Rafiee Iran
Ram Prasad India
Feng Wang relative to Fang Zhang China Fang Zhang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Fang Zhang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Feng Wang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Feng Wang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Feng Wang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Feng Wang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Feng Wang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Feng Wang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Feng Wang. The network helps show where Feng Wang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Feng Wang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Feng Wang Line = papers co-authored together Feng Wang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 303 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011230
2 2014206
3 2020206
4 2011205
5 2010180
6 2017172
7 2019167
8 2013167
9 2019166
10 2016147
11 2019129
12 2013127
13 2005125
14 2019125
15 2019124
16 2020120
17 2014107
18 2020104
19 2012102
20 2020101

About Feng Wang

Feng Wang is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Biomedical Engineering, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment and Pollution, having authored 303 papers that have together received 8.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Enzyme-mediated dye degradation (31 papers), Algal biology and biofuel production (28 papers), Biofuel production and bioconversion (22 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (18 papers), Electrochemical sensors and biosensors (18 papers), Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction (14 papers), Microbial Metabolism and Applications (10 papers) and Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (1.5k citations), Biotechnology (524 citations), Pollution (705 citations), Plant Science (1.6k citations) and Food Science (707 citations). Feng Wang has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Chunzhao Liu, Chen Guo, Ling Xu, Zhongyang Ding, Haile Ma, Shi‐Kai Wang, Amanda R. Stiles, Haizhen Yang, Jinghan Wang and Anzhou Ma. Their work appears in journals such as Bioresource Technology, Foods, Frontiers in Microbiology, Sustainability and Catalysts.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact