Felix Danbold

13 papers receiving 324 citations

Peers

Felix Danbold
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Gender Studies 101
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 11
  • Sociology and Political Science 266
  • Social Psychology 87
  • Safety Research 25
Replace Harry Blatterer with:
Harry Blatterer Australia
Matt J. Goren United States
Fabrice Gabarrot Switzerland
Jessy Siongers Belgium
Christopher D. Petsko United States
Samantha Holland United Kingdom
Grace Deason United States
Stephanie Owen United States
Stina Bergman Blix Sweden
Amy L. Hillard United States
Felix Danbold relative to Harry Blatterer Australia Harry Blatterer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.6×
Harry Blatterer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Felix Danbold

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Felix Danbold's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Felix Danbold with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Felix Danbold more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Felix Danbold

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Felix Danbold. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Felix Danbold. The network helps show where Felix Danbold may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Felix Danbold, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Felix Danbold Line = papers co-authored together Felix Danbold links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2014171
2 201745
3 201930
4 201924
5 202120
6 201618
7 202118
8 202310
9 20225
10 20224
11 20182
12 20221
13
Understanding Dominant Group Resistance to Social Change: The Role of Prototypicality Threat
20171
14 20221

About Felix Danbold

Felix Danbold is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Gender Studies, Occupational Therapy and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 14 papers that have together received 350 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (8 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (4 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (2 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (2 papers), Occupational Health and Performance (2 papers), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (1 paper), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (1 paper) and Aging and Gerontology Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (101 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (11 citations), Sociology and Political Science (266 citations), Social Psychology (87 citations) and Safety Research (25 citations). Felix Danbold has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Yuen J. Huo, Miguel M. Unzueta, Corinne Bendersky, David O. Sears, Ivuoma N. Onyeador, Michael S. North, Laura M. Giurge, Michael North, Jamie L. Gloor and Jochen I. Menges. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, RSF The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences and Journal of Applied Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact