Felix Danbold

13 papers receiving 298 citations

Peers

Felix Danbold
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Gender Studies 94
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 12
  • Sociology and Political Science 243
  • Social Psychology 81
  • Political Science and International Relations 71
Replace Matt J. Goren with:
Matt J. Goren United States
Harry Blatterer Australia
Christopher D. Petsko United States
Jessy Siongers Belgium
Fabrice Gabarrot Switzerland
Samantha Holland United Kingdom
Ana M. Martínez Alemán United States
Amy L. Hillard United States
Stina Bergman Blix Sweden
Stephanie Owen United States
Felix Danbold relative to Matt J. Goren United States Matt J. Goren's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Matt J. Goren · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Felix Danbold

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Felix Danbold's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Felix Danbold with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Felix Danbold more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Felix Danbold

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Felix Danbold. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Felix Danbold. The network helps show where Felix Danbold may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Felix Danbold, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Felix Danbold Line = papers co-authored together Felix Danbold links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2014153
2 201741
3 201929
4 201923
5 202119
6 201616
7 202115
8 202310
9 20225
10 20224
11 20182
12
Understanding Dominant Group Resistance to Social Change: The Role of Prototypicality Threat
20171
13 20221
14 20221

About Felix Danbold

Felix Danbold is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Gender Studies, Occupational Therapy and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 14 papers that have together received 320 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (8 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (4 papers), Occupational Health and Performance (2 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (2 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (2 papers), Social Media and Politics (1 paper), Career Development and Diversity (1 paper) and Social and Cultural Dynamics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (94 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (12 citations), Sociology and Political Science (243 citations), Social Psychology (81 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (71 citations). Felix Danbold has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Yuen J. Huo, Corinne Bendersky, Miguel M. Unzueta, David O. Sears, Ivuoma N. Onyeador, Michael S. North, Alexander F. Wagner, Jamie L. Gloor, Julia Lee and Jenny M. Hoobler. Their work appears in journals such as Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, RSF The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology and Journal of Applied Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact