Fátima Silva

16 papers receiving 263 citations

Peers

Fátima Silva
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Ophthalmology 111
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 84
  • Epidemiology 124
  • Animal Science and Zoology 28
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 47
Replace Joseph G. Chacko with:
Joseph G. Chacko United States
Martin Watson United Kingdom
Cem Çankaya Türkiye
Nozomi Kinoshita Japan
Stephen R. Glaser United States
Masoud Khorrami‐Nejad Iran
Denise J. Pearson United States
Ying-Cheng Shen Taiwan
Mitali Shah United States
Mukunda C. Akkali India
Fátima Silva relative to Joseph G. Chacko United States Joseph G. Chacko's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.3×
Joseph G. Chacko · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fátima Silva

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fátima Silva's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fátima Silva with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fátima Silva more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fátima Silva

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fátima Silva. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fátima Silva. The network helps show where Fátima Silva may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fátima Silva, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fátima Silva Line = papers co-authored together Fátima Silva links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201756
2 201740
3 200734
4 200830
5 200528
6 202121
7 201519
8 201916
9 201510
10 20199
11
[Basal-like carcinoma of the breast].
20096
12
Functional magnetic resonance imaging as an innovative tool to assess neuroadaptation after cataract surgery
20162
13 20241
14 20161
15 20141
16
Influência da comunicação na vida dos cuidadores de pessoas com afasia
20101
17 20250
18 20240
19 20250
20 20250

About Fátima Silva

Fátima Silva is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Ophthalmology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Surgery and Nephrology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 275 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (4 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (3 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (2 papers), Dialysis and Renal Disease Management (2 papers), Williams Syndrome Research (1 paper), Thyroid Disorders and Treatments (1 paper), Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics (1 paper) and Phonetics and Phonology Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (111 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (84 citations), Epidemiology (124 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (28 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (47 citations). Fátima Silva has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, United States and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Miguel Castelo‐Branco, Joaquim Murta, Andreia Rosa, Colm McAlinden, Miguel Patrício, Jorge Saraiva, João Massano, Antônio Fernando Menezes Freire, Gustavo Januário and Cristina Januário. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Kidney Journal, Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, European Journal of Ophthalmology, Cognitive Brain Research and Neuropsychologia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact