Fabienne Peter

1.5k citations
28 papers · 615 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Fabienne Peter

24 papers receiving 534 citations

Peers

Fabienne Peter
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Philosophy 115
  • Political Science and International Relations 210
  • General Health Professions 146
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 50
  • Sociology and Political Science 210
Replace Rhys Williams with:
Rhys Williams United Kingdom
Rutger Claassen Netherlands
David Hardiman United Kingdom
Kalman Applbaum United States
Judith Resnik United States
Elizabeth Vidler United Kingdom
Raymond A. Morrow Canada
Diemut Bubeck Mexico
Janie Percy‐Smith United Kingdom
Priyanka Pandey United States
Fabienne Peter relative to Rhys Williams United Kingdom Rhys Williams's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Rhys Williams · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fabienne Peter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fabienne Peter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fabienne Peter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fabienne Peter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fabienne Peter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fabienne Peter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fabienne Peter. The network helps show where Fabienne Peter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Fabienne Peter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fabienne Peter Line = papers co-authored together Fabienne Peter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Public Health, Ethics, and Equity
2005143
2 200981
3 200171
4 200365
5 200439
6 200732
7 200830
8 201226
9 201320
10 200319
11 202018
12 200611
13 200110
14 20239
15 20079
16 20178
17 20185
18 20234
19 20123
20 20083

About Fabienne Peter

Fabienne Peter is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 28 papers that have together received 615 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Philosophy and Ethics (17 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (9 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (8 papers), Free Will and Agency (4 papers), Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies (4 papers), Economic Theory and Institutions (4 papers), Critical Theory and Philosophy (3 papers) and Philosophy and Theoretical Science (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (115 citations), Political Science and International Relations (210 citations), General Health Professions (146 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (50 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (210 citations). Fabienne Peter has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Sudhir Anand, Amartya Sen and Hans Bernhard Schmid. Their work appears in journals such as Feminist Economics, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Episteme and Economics and Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact