Bert Useem

2.3k citations
47 papers · 1.5k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

Bert Useem

42 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Bert Useem
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Sociology and Political Science 1.2k
  • Political Science and International Relations 346
  • Clinical Psychology 246
  • General Health Professions 251
  • Public Administration 40
Replace Sheldon Ekland-Olson with:
Sheldon Ekland-Olson United States
Liz Fekete United Kingdom
Gallya Lahav United States
Joachim J. Savelsberg United States
William J. Chambliss United States
Rinus Penninx Netherlands
Franck Düvell United Kingdom
Caroline Nagel United States
Aaron Doyle Canada
Vaughan Robinson United Kingdom
Bert Useem relative to Sheldon Ekland-Olson United States Sheldon Ekland-Olson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×5×
Sheldon Ekland-Olson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bert Useem

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bert Useem's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bert Useem with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bert Useem more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bert Useem

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bert Useem. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bert Useem. The network helps show where Bert Useem may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Bert Useem, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bert Useem Line = papers co-authored together Bert Useem links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998126
2 2006115
3 1980106
4 198595
5 199991
6 199983
7 200576
8 200868
9 200865
10 198657
11 201251
12 198249
13 199345
14 200244
15 200941
16 202040
17 201738
18 199131
19 200330
20 197927

About Bert Useem

Bert Useem is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and History, having authored 47 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (16 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (13 papers), Political Conflict and Governance (8 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (8 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (6 papers), Social Capital and Networks (5 papers), Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (4 papers) and Policing Practices and Perceptions (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sociology and Political Science (1.2k citations), Political Science and International Relations (346 citations), Clinical Psychology (246 citations), General Health Professions (251 citations) and Public Administration (40 citations). Bert Useem has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Bangladesh and China. Frequent co-authors include Anne Morrison Piehl, Jack Α. Goldstone, Michael D. Reisig, Mayer N. Zald, Michael Useem, Mark Colvin, Robert L. Hall, Nonna Mayer, David C. Pyrooz and Ryan M. Labrecque. Their work appears in journals such as American Sociological Review, Social Forces, Criminology & Public Policy, Social Problems and Punishment & Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact