F.A. Johne

671 citations
14 papers · 510 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

F.A. Johne

11 papers receiving 377 citations

Peers

F.A. Johne
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Strategy and Management 311
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 132
  • Marketing 117
  • Business and International Management 25
  • Management Science and Operations Research 110
Replace Abdul Ali with:
Abdul Ali United States
Patricia W. Meyers United States
Andrew Beaumont Robertson United Kingdom
Mel Adams United States
Dominic Wilson United Kingdom
Sven Åke Hörte Sweden
John K. Christiansen Denmark
Thomas D. Kuczmarski United States
Claus J. Varnes Denmark
Jenny Poolton United Kingdom
F.A. Johne relative to Abdul Ali United States Abdul Ali's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Abdul Ali · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F.A. Johne

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F.A. Johne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F.A. Johne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F.A. Johne more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F.A. Johne

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F.A. Johne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F.A. Johne. The network helps show where F.A. Johne may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside F.A. Johne, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F.A. Johne Line = papers co-authored together F.A. Johne links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 1988208
2 198875
3 198459
4 198539
5 198932
6 199625
7 198424
8 199615
9
Industrial Product Innovation: Organisation and Management
198515
10 198410
11 19846
12 19841
13 19871
14 19680

About F.A. Johne

F.A. Johne is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Management Science and Operations Research, Management of Technology and Innovation, Marketing and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 14 papers that have together received 510 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovation and Knowledge Management (8 papers), Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting (4 papers), Business Strategy and Innovation (3 papers), Product Development and Customization (2 papers), Digital Platforms and Economics (2 papers), Competitive and Knowledge Intelligence (2 papers), Global Trade and Competitiveness (1 paper) and Business Strategies and Innovation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Strategy and Management (311 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (132 citations), Marketing (117 citations), Business and International Management (25 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (110 citations). F.A. Johne has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Paul Harborne and Michalis Pavlidis. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Product Innovation Management, Industrial Marketing Management, European Journal of Marketing, Management Decision and International Journal of Research in Marketing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact