F. Stoeckel

2.4k citations
49 papers · 2.0k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

F. Stoeckel

48 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

F. Stoeckel
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Spectroscopy 1.3k
  • Atmospheric Science 714
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.0k
  • Bioengineering 79
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 798
Replace J. E. M. Goldsmith with:
J. E. M. Goldsmith United States
Joel A. Silver United States
Edward A. Whittaker United States
E. A. Ballik Canada
D.L. Sivco United States
A. Kachanov France
Kevin C. Cossel United States
R. B. Wattson United States
J. S. Wells United States
Matthew S. Taubman United States
F. Stoeckel relative to J. E. M. Goldsmith United States J. E. M. Goldsmith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
J. E. M. Goldsmith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. Stoeckel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Stoeckel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Stoeckel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Stoeckel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Stoeckel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Stoeckel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Stoeckel. The network helps show where F. Stoeckel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside F. Stoeckel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. Stoeckel Line = papers co-authored together F. Stoeckel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997420
2 1997162
3 1999114
4 2001111
5 1999101
6 200077
7 199472
8 199464
9 199559
10 198558
11 199756
12 198653
13 198543
14 197943
15 198340
16 198537
17 199336
18 199135
19 198734
20 200129

About F. Stoeckel

F. Stoeckel is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atmospheric Science and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 49 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (30 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (12 papers), Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (11 papers), Laser Design and Applications (10 papers), Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (6 papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (6 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (5 papers) and Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (1.3k citations), Atmospheric Science (714 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.0k citations), Bioengineering (79 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (798 citations). F. Stoeckel has collaborated with scholars based in France, Israel and United States. Frequent co-authors include A. Kachanov, Éric Lacot, A. Campargue, M. Chenevier, N. Sadeghi, D. Romanini, R. Day, Aleš Charvát, G. H. Atkinson and M.‐A. Mélières. Their work appears in journals such as Chemical Physics Letters, The Journal of Chemical Physics, Chemical Physics, Physical Review A and Journal of the Optical Society of America B.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact