Merle E. Meyer

93 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Merle E. Meyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 181
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 715
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 331
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 219
  • Developmental Biology 34
Replace Harry I. Kalish with:
Harry I. Kalish United States
Giorgio Bignami Italy
Richard E. Wimer United States
Roger L. Mellgren United States
Arthur Tomie United States
Alan E. Fisher United States
Barbara H. Herman United States
F. Robert Brush United States
Kathryn C Montgomery United States
Bruce C. Dudek United States
Merle E. Meyer relative to Harry I. Kalish United States Harry I. Kalish's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.6×
Harry I. Kalish · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Merle E. Meyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Merle E. Meyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Merle E. Meyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Merle E. Meyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Merle E. Meyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Merle E. Meyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Merle E. Meyer. The network helps show where Merle E. Meyer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Merle E. Meyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Merle E. Meyer Line = papers co-authored together Merle E. Meyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 97 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991182
2 1967136
3 197578
4 198156
5 196855
6 198447
7 199347
8 199247
9 199346
10 199341
11 199341
12 199436
13 198934
14 199331
15 199329
16 197529
17 197627
18 196624
19 199222
20 199220

About Merle E. Meyer

Merle E. Meyer is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Animal Science and Zoology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Behavioral Neuroscience and Small Animals, having authored 97 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (14 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (13 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (10 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (10 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (10 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (10 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (9 papers) and Animal Behavior and Reproduction (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (181 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (715 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (331 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (219 citations) and Developmental Biology (34 citations). Merle E. Meyer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and France. Frequent co-authors include Frans van Haaren, Louis G. Lippman, Carol Van Hartesveldt, Daniel C. Hatton, Georgia A. Cottrell, Michael L. Woodruff, Daniel G. Webster, Thomas H. Lanthorn, Donald A. Dewsbury and Ronald L. Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, Physiology & Behavior, Developmental Psychobiology, Behavioural Brain Research and Cell and Tissue Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact