F. Rings
Impact in
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 0.5%
- Reproductive Physiology in Livestock
-
- Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Papers in
-
- Reproductive Physiology in Livestock 36
-
- Reproductive Biology and Fertility 52
- Co-authors
- K. Schellander (70 shared papers)Dawit Tesfaye (68 shared papers)Michael Hoelker (74 shared papers)Ernst Tholen (50 shared papers)Dessie Salilew‐Wondim (48 shared papers)Christian Looft (17 shared papers)Christiane Neuhoff (17 shared papers)Eva Held-Hoelker (26 shared papers)
- Journals
- Reproduction Fertility and Development (21 papers)PLoS ONE (7 papers)BMC Genomics (6 papers)Theriogenology (6 papers)Reproduction (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyAustriaUnited States
In The Last Decade
F. Rings
72 papers receiving 2.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Agronomy and Crop Science 1.1k
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1.5k
- Cancer Research 307
- Reproductive Medicine 157
- Genetics 337
Countries citing papers authored by F. Rings
This map shows the geographic impact of F. Rings's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Rings with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Rings more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by F. Rings
This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Rings. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Rings. The network helps show where F. Rings may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside F. Rings, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 75 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 292 | |
| 2 | 2006 | 213 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 156 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 136 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 135 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 105 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 93 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 92 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 89 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 88 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 86 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 84 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 75 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 71 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 63 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 60 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 59 | |
| 18 | 2016 | 58 | |
| 19 | 2007 | 53 | |
| 20 | 2019 | 50 |
About F. Rings
F. Rings is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Genetics, Cancer Research and Molecular Biology, having authored 75 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Biology and Fertility (52 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (36 papers), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (12 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (4 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (4 papers), MicroRNA in disease regulation (4 papers), Extracellular vesicles in disease (3 papers) and Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (1.1k citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (1.5k citations), Cancer Research (307 citations), Reproductive Medicine (157 citations) and Genetics (337 citations). F. Rings has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and United States. Frequent co-authors include K. Schellander, Dawit Tesfaye, Michael Hoelker, Ernst Tholen, Dessie Salilew‐Wondim, Christian Looft, Christiane Neuhoff, Eva Held-Hoelker, Marc‐André Sirard and Urban Besenfelder. Their work appears in journals such as Reproduction Fertility and Development, PLoS ONE, BMC Genomics, Theriogenology and Reproduction.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.