F. Moos

4.8k citations
71 papers · 3.8k · h-index 32

Impact in

Papers in

F. Moos

71 papers receiving 3.7k citations

Peers

F. Moos
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 1.8k
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 532
  • Social Psychology 2.5k
  • Pharmacy 443
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.2k
Replace Javier E. Stern with:
Javier E. Stern United States
Marie José Freund‐Mercier France
Celia D. Sladek United States
P.E. Sawchenko United States
Nancy Sabatier United Kingdom
Thackery S. Gray United States
Hiroshi Kannan Japan
Joop J. van Heerikhuize Netherlands
T. Hökfelt Sweden
Teresa L. Krukoff Canada
F. Moos relative to Javier E. Stern United States Javier E. Stern's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Javier E. Stern · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. Moos

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Moos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Moos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Moos more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Moos

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Moos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Moos. The network helps show where F. Moos may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside F. Moos, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. Moos Line = papers co-authored together F. Moos links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 71 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991311
2 2004299
3 1984222
4 1997187
5 1989184
6 1994167
7 2000164
8 1998144
9 1989129
10 1986127
11 2008119
12 1993105
13 200188
14 198485
15 199884
16 198283
17 199568
18 200263
19 200955
20 200052

About F. Moos

F. Moos is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Pharmacy and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 71 papers that have together received 3.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (53 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (38 papers), Infant Health and Development (11 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (11 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (10 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (10 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (6 papers) and Apelin-related biomedical research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (1.8k citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (532 citations), Social Psychology (2.5k citations), Pharmacy (443 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.2k citations). F. Moos has collaborated with scholars based in France, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Philippe Richard, Ph. Richard, Michel G. Desarménien, Nicolas Hussy, Marie José Freund‐Mercier, P Richard, Charlotte Deleuze, Véronique D. Belin, Govindan Dayanithi and Régis C. Lambert. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Physiology, Journal of Neuroendocrinology, Neuroscience, Journal of Neuroscience and European Journal of Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact