F. M. Berger

65 papers receiving 505 citations

Peers

F. M. Berger
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 107
  • Pharmacology 50
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 84
  • Pharmacology 72
  • Toxicology 14
Replace Erik Jacobsen with:
Erik Jacobsen Denmark
John A. Labudde United States
Douglas Maxwell United States
Eigill F. Hvidberg Denmark
John P. Gonzalez United Kingdom
D. Warot France
A. Darragh Ireland
S. J. CORNE Canada
R. A. A. Maes Netherlands
C. W. M. Wilson Ireland
F. M. Berger relative to Erik Jacobsen Denmark Erik Jacobsen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Erik Jacobsen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. M. Berger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. M. Berger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. M. Berger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. M. Berger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. M. Berger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. M. Berger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. M. Berger. The network helps show where F. M. Berger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside F. M. Berger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. M. Berger Line = papers co-authored together F. M. Berger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1954115
2 195760
3 198925
4 196924
5 196921
6 196320
7 195219
8 200019
9 196119
10 196718
11 197517
12 200316
13
Unusual muscle relaxant and analgesic properties of N-isopropyl-2-propyl-1,3-propanediol dicarbamate (carisoprodol).
195915
14 195914
15 195614
16 196713
17 196312
18 196112
19 197411
20 196910

About F. M. Berger

F. M. Berger is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Pharmacology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 69 papers that have together received 642 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (8 papers), Immune Response and Inflammation (5 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (4 papers), Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors (3 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (3 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (3 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (3 papers) and Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (107 citations), Pharmacology (50 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (84 citations), Pharmacology (72 citations) and Toxicology (14 citations). F. M. Berger has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and France. Frequent co-authors include B. J. Ludwig, M. Kletzkin, Lutz Frölich, J. F. Douglas, S. Margolin, J. P. Rosselet, Charles D. Hendley, Pasquale Calabrese, J.L. Touraine and Claus Göbel. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Biology and Medicine, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry and European Neuropsychopharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact