F. Jazat

1.6k citations
19 papers · 1.4k · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

F. Jazat

19 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

F. Jazat
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Physiology 1.1k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 718
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 119
  • Neurology 296
  • Neurology 131
Replace Mitsuo Tanabe with:
Mitsuo Tanabe Japan
Teresa Pélissier Chile
Michael L. Nichols United States
Valérie Kayser France
Maria Luisa Sotgiu Italy
Yoshinori Yajima Japan
Kan Miyoshi Japan
K. O. Aley United States
J.M. Benoist France
Kiran Yashpal Canada
F. Jazat relative to Mitsuo Tanabe Japan Mitsuo Tanabe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Mitsuo Tanabe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. Jazat

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Jazat's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Jazat with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Jazat more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Jazat

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Jazat. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Jazat. The network helps show where F. Jazat may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside F. Jazat, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. Jazat Line = papers co-authored together F. Jazat links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 1990457
2 1991220
3 1990135
4 1992101
5 199092
6 199381
7 199480
8 201674
9 198948
10 199141
11 199122
12 199220
13 199417
14 199314
15 19934
16 19913
17 19953
18 20153
19
Naloxone induces a bidirectional effect on phasic and "spontaneous" pain-related behaviour in rats with a peripheral mononeuropathy.
19902

About F. Jazat

F. Jazat is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Physiology, Neurology, Molecular Biology and Surgery, having authored 19 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (12 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (6 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (5 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (4 papers), Cardiovascular, Neuropeptides, and Oxidative Stress Research (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (3 papers) and Ion channel regulation and function (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (1.1k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (718 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (119 citations), Neurology (296 citations) and Neurology (131 citations). F. Jazat has collaborated with scholars based in France, South Korea and Tunisia. Frequent co-authors include G. Guilbaud, Nadine Attal, V. Kayser, M. Gautron, Allan I. Basbaum, Y. Lamour, J.M. Benoist, J J Hauw, Brigitte Potier and Olivier Rascol. Their work appears in journals such as Pain, Neuroscience, The Journal of Comparative Neurology, Brain Research and Naunyn-Schmiedeberg s Archives of Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact