F. Defoort

881 citations
39 papers · 668 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

F. Defoort

38 papers receiving 635 citations

Peers

F. Defoort
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 95
  • Biomedical Engineering 343
  • Catalysis 50
  • Materials Chemistry 269
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 48
Replace Huanhuan Xu with:
Huanhuan Xu China
Zhixiong You China
Yongseung Yun South Korea
Guanyu Jiang China
Guixuan Wu Germany
Peng Feng China
Boyang Xu China
Elena Yazhenskikh Germany
Young-Joo Lee South Korea
F. Defoort relative to Huanhuan Xu China Huanhuan Xu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Huanhuan Xu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. Defoort

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Defoort's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Defoort with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Defoort more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Defoort

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Defoort. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Defoort. The network helps show where F. Defoort may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside F. Defoort, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. Defoort Line = papers co-authored together F. Defoort links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202069
2 201264
3 200547
4 202041
5 200740
6 201339
7 201530
8 201128
9 200726
10 201426
11 202023
12 202217
13 200317
14 201415
15 200915
16 200914
17 201813
18 198813
19 202013
20 201913

About F. Defoort

F. Defoort is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Mechanical Engineering, Geochemistry and Petrology and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 39 papers that have together received 668 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes (22 papers), Nuclear Materials and Properties (10 papers), Thermal and Kinetic Analysis (10 papers), Coal and Its By-products (9 papers), Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (6 papers), Metallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics (6 papers), Iron and Steelmaking Processes (5 papers) and Coal Combustion and Slurry Processing (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geochemistry and Petrology (95 citations), Biomedical Engineering (343 citations), Catalysis (50 citations), Materials Chemistry (269 citations) and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (48 citations). F. Defoort has collaborated with scholars based in France, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Capucine Dupont, Jacques Poirier, Karine Froment, Mejdi Jeguirim, J.M. Seiler, Madona Labaki, Besma Khiari, Céline Bertrand, S. Ravel and Sébastien Thiery. Their work appears in journals such as Energy & Fuels, Journal of Nuclear Materials, Fuel, Energies and Oil & Gas Science and Technology – Revue d’IFP Energies nouvelles.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact