F. Carlier

1.6k citations
38 papers · 1.3k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

F. Carlier

38 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

F. Carlier
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 946
  • Atmospheric Science 349
  • Condensed Matter Physics 123
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 89
  • Materials Chemistry 343
Replace William V. Smith with:
William V. Smith United States
Paul H. Kobrin United States
Vladimir A. Lobastov United States
Torbjörn Rander Sweden
Intae Eom South Korea
Brian Weiner United States
Renaud Delaunay France
J. Geiger Germany
Rami Sankari Finland
A. De Fanis Japan
F. Carlier relative to William V. Smith United States William V. Smith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.8×
William V. Smith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. Carlier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Carlier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Carlier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Carlier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Carlier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Carlier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Carlier. The network helps show where F. Carlier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside F. Carlier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. Carlier Line = papers co-authored together F. Carlier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1989150
2 1990141
3 199999
4 198998
5 199485
6 200285
7 199268
8 199161
9 199060
10 199351
11 199448
12 199945
13 199543
14 199141
15 199025
16 199023
17 199323
18 200621
19 200121
20 201219

About F. Carlier

F. Carlier is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Atmospheric Science, Condensed Matter Physics, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and Spectroscopy, having authored 38 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (18 papers), nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions (14 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (10 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (8 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (6 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (4 papers) and Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (946 citations), Atmospheric Science (349 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (123 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (89 citations) and Materials Chemistry (343 citations). F. Carlier has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Ph. Cahuzac, Catherine Bréchignac, M. de Frutos, J. Leygnier, Arthur Masson, C. Colliex, J. Ph. Roux, Bokwon Yoon, Uzi Landman and V. M. Akulin. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, The Journal of Chemical Physics, physica status solidi (b), Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics and Surface Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact