F. Carlier

1.5k citations
36 papers · 1.2k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

F. Carlier

36 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

F. Carlier
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 857
  • Atmospheric Science 331
  • Condensed Matter Physics 116
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 69
  • Materials Chemistry 311
Replace P. Stampfli with:
P. Stampfli Germany
R. David Germany
F. Tommasini Italy
Brian Weiner United States
William V. Smith United States
N. Böwering Germany
J. Tiggesbäumker Germany
Jongjin B. Kim United States
C. W. Walter United States
Wataru Sasaki Japan
F. Carlier relative to P. Stampfli Germany P. Stampfli's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
P. Stampfli · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. Carlier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Carlier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Carlier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Carlier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Carlier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Carlier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Carlier. The network helps show where F. Carlier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside F. Carlier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. Carlier Line = papers co-authored together F. Carlier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1989130
2 1990125
3 199995
4 198988
5 200283
6 199476
7 199056
8 199156
9 199255
10 199348
11 199945
12 199445
13 199540
14 199135
15 199322
16 199022
17 200621
18 199021
19 200119
20 201218

About F. Carlier

F. Carlier is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Atmospheric Science, Condensed Matter Physics, Materials Chemistry and Spectroscopy, having authored 36 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (16 papers), nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions (13 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (9 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (8 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (6 papers), Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions (4 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (4 papers) and Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (857 citations), Atmospheric Science (331 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (116 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (69 citations) and Materials Chemistry (311 citations). F. Carlier has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Ph. Cahuzac, C. Bréchignac, M. de Frutos, J. Leygnier, A. Masson, C. Colliex, J. Ph. Roux, Bokwon Yoon, Uzi Landman and V. M. Akulin. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, The Journal of Chemical Physics, Physical review. B, Condensed matter, Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics and The European Physical Journal D.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact