Human Rights Quarterly

1.5k papers and 19.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.5k papers published in Human Rights Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 19.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Human Rights Quarterly usually cover Sociology and Political Science (877 papers), Political Science and International Relations (847 papers) and History (279 papers) specifically the topics of Human Rights and Development (458 papers), International Law and Human Rights (390 papers) and Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (270 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Human Rights Quarterly are Jack Donnelly, Philip Alston, David L. Richards, David Cingranelli, Paige Arthur, Priscilla Hayner, Harvey M. Weinstein, Anne T. Gallagher, Charlotte Bunch and Mark Gibney.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Human Rights Quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Human Rights Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Human Rights Quarterly.

Countries where authors publish in Human Rights Quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Human Rights Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Human Rights Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Human Rights Quarterly more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025