Countries where authors publish in Human Rights Quarterly
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Human Rights Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Human Rights Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Human Rights Quarterly more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Human Rights Quarterly
This network shows the impact of papers published in Human Rights Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Human Rights Quarterly.
About Human Rights Quarterly
The 1.5k papers published in Human Rights Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 23.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Human Rights Quarterly usually cover Political Science and International Relations (839 papers), History (275 papers), Law (222 papers), Sociology and Political Science (870 papers) and Development (56 papers) specifically the topics of Human Rights and Development (451 papers), International Law and Human Rights (383 papers), Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (266 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (243 papers), International Human Rights and Reproductive Law (75 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (71 papers), Torture, Ethics, and Law (65 papers) and Ombudsman and Human Rights (61 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Human Rights Quarterly are Jack Donnelly, Philip Alston, Paige Arthur, Priscilla Hayner, David L. Richards, David Cingranelli, Harvey M. Weinstein, Mark Gibney, Charlotte Bunch and David P. Forsythe.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.