Eva Trost
Impact in
- Endocrinology top 1%
- Diphtheria, Corynebacterium, and Tetanus
- Clinical Biochemistry top 5%
- Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Papers in
-
- Diphtheria, Corynebacterium, and Tetanus 12
- Escherichia coli research studies 3
-
- Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies 3
- Co-authors
- Andreas Tauch (15 shared papers)Jasmin Schröder (4 shared papers)Alexander Goesmann (8 shared papers)Jessica Schneider (6 shared papers)Antje Flieger (6 shared papers)Irena Maus (2 shared papers)Rita Prager (4 shared papers)Vasco Azevedo (6 shared papers)
- Journals
- BMC Genomics (6 papers)Journal of Clinical Microbiology (1 paper)Frontiers in Plant Science (1 paper)Journal of Bacteriology (1 paper)mBio (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyBrazilUnited States
In The Last Decade
Eva Trost
25 papers receiving 905 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Endocrinology 420
- Clinical Biochemistry 129
- Molecular Medicine 79
- Biotechnology 129
- Food Science 238
Countries citing papers authored by Eva Trost
This map shows the geographic impact of Eva Trost's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eva Trost with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eva Trost more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Eva Trost
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eva Trost. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eva Trost. The network helps show where Eva Trost may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eva Trost, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 92 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 90 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 76 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 63 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 61 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 59 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 59 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 55 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 54 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 53 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 42 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 36 | |
| 13 | 2010 | 36 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 31 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 28 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 23 | |
| 17 | 2010 | 17 | |
| 18 | 2015 | 14 | |
| 19 | 2012 | 12 | |
| 20 | Ultrafast de novo sequencing of Corynebacterium urealyticum using the Genome Sequencer 20 System. | 2006 | 9 |
About Eva Trost
Eva Trost is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Molecular Biology, Epidemiology, Food Science and Biotechnology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 929 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diphtheria, Corynebacterium, and Tetanus (12 papers), Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (4 papers), Mycobacterium research and diagnosis (3 papers), Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety (3 papers), Escherichia coli research studies (3 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (3 papers), Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research (2 papers) and Urinary Tract Infections Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology (420 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (129 citations), Molecular Medicine (79 citations), Biotechnology (129 citations) and Food Science (238 citations). Eva Trost has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Brazil and United States. Frequent co-authors include Andreas Tauch, Jasmin Schröder, Alexander Goesmann, Jessica Schneider, Antje Flieger, Irena Maus, Rita Prager, Vasco Azevedo, Jochen Blom and Siomar de Castro Soares. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Genomics, Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Frontiers in Plant Science, Journal of Bacteriology and mBio.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.