Eva Schmidt

894 citations
21 papers · 457 · 1 hit paper · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Eva Schmidt

15 papers receiving 447 citations

Eva Schmidt's Hit Papers

What do we want from Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)? – A stakeholder perspective on XAI and a conceptual model guiding interdisciplinary XAI research 2021 · 336 citations
3360+1+3Years since publication100200300

Peers

Eva Schmidt
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Health Informatics 92
  • Safety Research 151
  • Artificial Intelligence 272
  • Information Systems and Management 28
  • Philosophy 37
Replace Alon Jacovi with:
Alon Jacovi Israel
Jamila Smith-Loud United States
Ana Marasović United States
Cindy Mason United States
Nina Grgić-Hlača Germany
Parker Barnes United States
Suzanne Tolmeijer Switzerland
Giora Alexandron Israel
Marija Slavkovik Norway
Scott Robbins Germany
Eva Schmidt relative to Alon Jacovi Israel Alon Jacovi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.3×
Alon Jacovi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eva Schmidt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eva Schmidt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eva Schmidt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eva Schmidt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eva Schmidt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eva Schmidt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eva Schmidt. The network helps show where Eva Schmidt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Eva Schmidt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eva Schmidt Line = papers co-authored together Eva Schmidt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
What do we want from Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)? – A stakeholder perspective on XAI and a conceptual model guiding interdisciplinary XAI research
Hit paper breakdown →
2021336
2 202258
3 202013
4 20159
5 20179
6 20237
7 20175
8
Public Art : A Reader
20044
9 20233
10 20253
11 20213
12 20232
13 20172
14 20192
15 20151
16 20240
17 20240
18
Lieber Aby Warburg - was tun mit Bildern?
20120
19 20230
20 20210

About Eva Schmidt

Eva Schmidt is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Artificial Intelligence and Safety Research, having authored 21 papers that have together received 457 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (8 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (7 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (5 papers), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (3 papers), Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) (3 papers), Free Will and Agency (2 papers) and Quantum Mechanics and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (92 citations), Safety Research (151 citations), Artificial Intelligence (272 citations), Information Systems and Management (28 citations) and Philosophy (37 citations). Eva Schmidt has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Kevin Baum, Timo Speith, Andreas Sesing-Wagenpfeil, Markus Langer, Daniel Oster, Holger Hermanns, Lena Kästner, Hans‐Johann Glock, Rianne Fijten and Paul Martin Putora. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy & Technology, Ethics, Journal for General Philosophy of Science, Philosophia and Philosophical Explorations.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact