Eva Prats

91 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Eva Prats
Comparison fields: 5 of 148
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 452
  • Pollution 283
  • Cell Biology 305
  • Physiology 41
  • Paleontology 63
Replace Robert W. Read with:
Robert W. Read United States
Guangyu Li China
Russell Pickford Australia
Giovanna Romano Italy
Tania Zenteno‐Savín Mexico
Angela Mauceri Italy
Elijah W. Stommel United States
William G. Willmore Canada
Elisabetta Tosti Italy
Hiroshi Yamashita Japan
Eva Prats relative to Robert W. Read United States Robert W. Read's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Robert W. Read · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eva Prats

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eva Prats's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eva Prats with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eva Prats more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eva Prats

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eva Prats. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eva Prats. The network helps show where Eva Prats may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eva Prats, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eva Prats Line = papers co-authored together Eva Prats links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 92 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996133
2 198987
3 201186
4 201884
5 202081
6 201573
7 201473
8 202165
9 201860
10 199953
11 202349
12 201648
13 201746
14 201346
15 200244
16 200939
17 201935
18 202035
19 201432
20 201830

About Eva Prats

Eva Prats is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Plant Science and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 92 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications (18 papers), Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (17 papers), Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity (10 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (5 papers), Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts (5 papers), Potato Plant Research (5 papers), Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies (5 papers) and Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (452 citations), Pollution (283 citations), Cell Biology (305 citations), Physiology (41 citations) and Paleontology (63 citations). Eva Prats has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Demetrio Raldúa, Cristian Gómez‐Canela, Melissa Faria, Juliette Bedrossiantz, Benjamı́n Piña, Leobardo Manuel Gómez‐Oliván, Romá Tauler, Marina Bellot, Natàlia García‐Reyero and Carlos Barata. Their work appears in journals such as The Science of The Total Environment, Scientific Reports, Environmental Pollution, Chemosphere and Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact