Eugen Dimant

2.8k citations
72 papers · 1.4k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Eugen Dimant

67 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Eugen Dimant
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • General Decision Sciences 132
  • Safety Research 509
  • Applied Psychology 127
  • Sociology and Political Science 843
  • Demography 189
Replace Jen Shang with:
Jen Shang United States
Erin L. Krupka United States
Benjamin Enke United States
Joël J. van der Weele Netherlands
Daniele Nosenzo United Kingdom
Enrique Fatás Spain
Cristina Bicchieri United States
Susanne Neckermann Switzerland
Shirli Kopelman United States
Luigi Mittone Italy
Eugen Dimant relative to Jen Shang United States Jen Shang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Jen Shang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eugen Dimant

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eugen Dimant's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eugen Dimant with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eugen Dimant more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eugen Dimant

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eugen Dimant. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eugen Dimant. The network helps show where Eugen Dimant may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eugen Dimant, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eugen Dimant Line = papers co-authored together Eugen Dimant links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 72 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017202
2 2019183
3 2019101
4 201998
5 201372
6 202066
7 202149
8 202345
9 202242
10 202230
11 201429
12 202228
13 202327
14 201925
15 202125
16 202022
17 201821
18 201821
19 202018
20 202017

About Eugen Dimant

Eugen Dimant is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Safety Research, Cognitive Neuroscience, Economics and Econometrics and Demography, having authored 72 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (37 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (14 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (14 papers), Culture, Economy, and Development Studies (10 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (9 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (7 papers), Corruption and Economic Development (7 papers) and Electoral Systems and Political Participation (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (132 citations), Safety Research (509 citations), Applied Psychology (127 citations), Sociology and Political Science (843 citations) and Demography (189 citations). Eugen Dimant has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Norway and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Cristina Bicchieri, Cristina Bicchieri, Tim Krieger, Silvia Sonderegger, Shaul Shalvi, Daniel Meierrieks, Erte Xiao, Gerben A. van Kleef, Michele J. Gelfand and Maurice E. Schweitzer. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, European Economic Review, Economics Letters, Management Science and Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact