Erte Xiao

1.8k citations
59 papers · 1.0k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Erte Xiao

51 papers receiving 967 citations

Peers

Erte Xiao
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Safety Research 683
  • General Decision Sciences 150
  • Demography 230
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 222
  • Sociology and Political Science 447
Replace Alexandra Mislin with:
Alexandra Mislin United States
Elke Renner United Kingdom
Alexander Vostroknutov Netherlands
M. Vittoria Levati Italy
Enrique Fatás Spain
Johanna Möllerström United States
Erik O. Kimbrough United States
Jonathan H. W. Tan United Kingdom
Gari Walkowitz Germany
Jeroen van de Ven Netherlands
Erte Xiao relative to Alexandra Mislin United States Alexandra Mislin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Alexandra Mislin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Erte Xiao

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Erte Xiao's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erte Xiao with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erte Xiao more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Erte Xiao

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erte Xiao. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erte Xiao. The network helps show where Erte Xiao may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Erte Xiao, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Erte Xiao Line = papers co-authored together Erte Xiao links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201091
2 200981
3 200880
4 201173
5 201072
6 201062
7 201057
8 202149
9 201245
10 201042
11 201441
12 201030
13 201624
14 201023
15 202123
16 201421
17 201821
18 201519
19 201615
20 201814

About Erte Xiao

Erte Xiao is a scholar working on Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science, Demography, Cognitive Neuroscience and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 59 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (49 papers), Culture, Economy, and Development Studies (20 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (16 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (13 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (9 papers), Taxation and Compliance Studies (8 papers), Game Theory and Applications (4 papers) and Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (683 citations), General Decision Sciences (150 citations), Demography (230 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (222 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (447 citations). Erte Xiao has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Houser, Cristina Bicchieri, Eugen Dimant, Ryan Muldoon, Lingfang Li, Jian Li, P. Read Montague, Sandra J. Peart, David M. Levy and Fangfang Tan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Games and Economic Behavior, Journal of Economic Psychology, Economics Letters and Journal of Public Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact