Dylan Pieper
Impact in
- Modeling and Simulation top 5%
- COVID-19 epidemiological studies
- Health top 10%
- Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Papers in
-
- Social and Intergroup Psychology 2
- Climate Change Communication and Perception 1
-
- Cultural Differences and Values 2
- Co-authors
- Michele J. Gelfand (4 shared papers)Joshua Conrad Jackson (2 shared papers)Mo Wang (1 shared paper)Paul A. M. Van Lange (1 shared paper)Munqith Dagher (1 shared paper)Chi‐yue Chiu (1 shared paper)Dana Nau (1 shared paper)Xinyue Pan (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Scientific Reports (1 paper)Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (1 paper)The Lancet Planetary Health (1 paper)SSRN Electronic Journal (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsSweden
In The Last Decade
Dylan Pieper
4 papers receiving 375 citations
Dylan Pieper's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Modeling and Simulation 75
- Health 65
- Social Psychology 144
- Applied Psychology 35
- Cognitive Neuroscience 85
Countries citing papers authored by Dylan Pieper
This map shows the geographic impact of Dylan Pieper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dylan Pieper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dylan Pieper more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dylan Pieper
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dylan Pieper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dylan Pieper. The network helps show where Dylan Pieper may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 15 scholars most cited alongside Dylan Pieper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The relationship between cultural tightness–looseness and COVID-19 cases and deaths: a global analysis Hit paper breakdown → | 2021 | 328 |
| 2 | 2022 | 42 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 16 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 3 |
About Dylan Pieper
Dylan Pieper is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 4 papers that have together received 389 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cultural Differences and Values (2 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (1 paper), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper), COVID-19 epidemiological studies (1 paper), Climate Change Communication and Perception (1 paper), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (1 paper) and Climate Change and Health Impacts (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Modeling and Simulation (75 citations), Health (65 citations), Social Psychology (144 citations), Applied Psychology (35 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (85 citations). Dylan Pieper has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Michele J. Gelfand, Joshua Conrad Jackson, Mo Wang, Paul A. M. Van Lange, Munqith Dagher, Chi‐yue Chiu, Dana Nau, Xinyue Pan, Eugen Dimant and Virginia K. Choi. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, The Lancet Planetary Health and SSRN Electronic Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.