Etienne Stanus

820 citations
24 papers · 609 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Etienne Stanus

24 papers receiving 580 citations

Peers

Etienne Stanus
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Genetics 171
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 131
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 157
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 186
  • Clinical Psychology 163
Replace Gérardo Conesa with:
Gérardo Conesa Spain
Hanna Ansakorpi Finland
L. Volpi Italy
Edoardo Mazzucchi Italy
Britt-Marie Berggren Sweden
Evangelia Tsolaki United States
Karl‐Heinz Nenning Austria
M. Würker Germany
Jonathon J. Parker United States
Etienne Stanus relative to Gérardo Conesa Spain Gérardo Conesa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Gérardo Conesa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Etienne Stanus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Etienne Stanus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Etienne Stanus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Etienne Stanus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Etienne Stanus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Etienne Stanus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Etienne Stanus. The network helps show where Etienne Stanus may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Etienne Stanus, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Etienne Stanus Line = papers co-authored together Etienne Stanus links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997131
2 1996106
3 199263
4 199353
5 198745
6 200833
7 199532
8 200829
9 199327
10 200622
11 199418
12 199511
13 199311
14 19929
15 19964
16 19963
17 19922
18 19882
19
[Cerebral lesions following convulsive partial status epilepticus. Clinical, neuroradiologic and PET study of a case].
19942
20 19922

About Etienne Stanus

Etienne Stanus is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Genetics, Neurology and Signal Processing, having authored 24 papers that have together received 609 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (7 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (7 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (4 papers), Blind Source Separation Techniques (4 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (4 papers), Sleep and related disorders (3 papers) and Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (171 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (131 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (157 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (186 citations) and Clinical Psychology (163 citations). Etienne Stanus has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Netherlands and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Serge Goldman, Myriam Kerkhofs, André Luxen, Luc Bidaut, Marc Levivier, Jerzy Hildebrand, Jacques Brotchi, Julien Mendlewicz, José de la Fuente and Julio Bobes. Their work appears in journals such as Cancer, Neurosurgery, Movement Disorders, Neuropsychobiology and Journal of Psychiatric Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact