Esther E.E. Drees

1.8k citations
11 papers · 373 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Esther E.E. Drees

11 papers receiving 371 citations

Peers

Esther E.E. Drees
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Cancer Research 224
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 90
  • Oncology 115
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 110
  • Molecular Biology 216
Replace Jihane Tannous with:
Jihane Tannous United States
Xiaoli Long China
Yuji Shimoda Japan
Ingrid Lafer Austria
Kunal Saigal United States
Wenhua Xiao China
Bin-Chao Wang China
Matilde Lambiase Italy
Charlotta Hedner Sweden
Clara Mayo‐de‐las‐Casas Spain
Esther E.E. Drees relative to Jihane Tannous United States Jihane Tannous's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Jihane Tannous · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Esther E.E. Drees

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Esther E.E. Drees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Esther E.E. Drees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Esther E.E. Drees more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Esther E.E. Drees

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Esther E.E. Drees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Esther E.E. Drees. The network helps show where Esther E.E. Drees may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Esther E.E. Drees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Esther E.E. Drees Line = papers co-authored together Esther E.E. Drees links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2015156
2 2016129
3 202236
4 202025
5 202210
6 20217
7 20243
8 20153
9 20032
10 20211
11 20221

About Esther E.E. Drees

Esther E.E. Drees is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Molecular Biology, Cancer Research, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Oncology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 373 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (7 papers), MicroRNA in disease regulation (3 papers), Extracellular vesicles in disease (3 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (2 papers), Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (2 papers), Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies (1 paper), Phagocytosis and Immune Regulation (1 paper) and Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (224 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (90 citations), Oncology (115 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (110 citations) and Molecular Biology (216 citations). Esther E.E. Drees has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include D. Michiel Pegtel, Josée M. Zijlstra, Daphne de Jong, Monique A.J. van Eijndhoven, Anke van den Berg, Egbert F. Smit, Anne‐Marie C. Dingemans, Thomas Würdinger, Pepijn Schellen and Rafael Rosell. Their work appears in journals such as Trends in cancer, Journal of Nuclear Medicine, Journal of Clinical Oncology, HemaSphere and Oncotarget.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact