Ernest E. Shult

73 papers receiving 965 citations

Peers

Ernest E. Shult
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 835
  • Algebra and Number Theory 243
  • Geometry and Topology 331
  • Mathematical Physics 141
  • Artificial Intelligence 413
Replace D. G. Higman with:
D. G. Higman United States
Jin Ho Kwak South Korea
Bernard R. McDonald United States
Harold N. Ward United States
Martin Škoviera Slovakia
Roman Nedela Slovakia
Ákos Seress United States
Leo Storme Belgium
Thomas W. Tucker United States
Jason Fulman United States
Ernest E. Shult relative to D. G. Higman United States D. G. Higman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
D. G. Higman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ernest E. Shult

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ernest E. Shult's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ernest E. Shult with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ernest E. Shult more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ernest E. Shult

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ernest E. Shult. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ernest E. Shult. The network helps show where Ernest E. Shult may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Ernest E. Shult, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ernest E. Shult Line = papers co-authored together Ernest E. Shult links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 77 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1980153
2 1976126
3 197479
4 196566
5 199449
6 199749
7 200142
8 196935
9 197232
10 199228
11 198525
12 199224
13 199724
14 196624
15 197223
16 195920
17 198420
18 196220
19 199520
20 197215

About Ernest E. Shult

Ernest E. Shult is a scholar working on Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, Geometry and Topology, Algebra and Number Theory, Molecular Biology and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 77 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Finite Group Theory Research (31 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (18 papers), graph theory and CDMA systems (17 papers), Mathematics and Applications (11 papers), Coding theory and cryptography (8 papers), Fungal and yeast genetics research (8 papers), Advanced Algebra and Geometry (7 papers) and Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (835 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (243 citations), Geometry and Topology (331 citations), Mathematical Physics (141 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (413 citations). Ernest E. Shult has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Carl C. Lindegren, J. A. Thas, Francis Buekenhout, J.-M. Goethals, J.J. Seidel, Peter J‎. Cameron, Bruce N. Cooperstein, Jonathan I. Hall, Gertrude Lindegren and Sharon Desborough. Their work appears in journals such as Geometriae Dedicata, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, Journal of Algebra, Illinois Journal of Mathematics and Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact