Erik Stenius
Impact in
- Philosophy top 1%
- Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Papers in
- Philosophy 11
- Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications 6
-
- Philosophy, Science, and History 3
- Philosophy and History of Science 2
- Co-authors
- Newton Garver (1 shared paper)Rush Rhees (2 shared papers)Ludwig Wittgenstein (3 shared papers)Irving M. Copi (1 shared paper)James C. Morrison (1 shared paper)G. H. von Wright (1 shared paper)G. D. Duthie (1 shared paper)Frank Plumpton Ramsey (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Theoria (7 papers)The Philosophical Review (4 papers)The Philosophical Quarterly (4 papers)dialectica (4 papers)Synthese (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- Finland
In The Last Decade
Erik Stenius
25 papers receiving 297 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Philosophy 202
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 167
- Language and Linguistics 125
- History and Philosophy of Science 50
- Theoretical Computer Science 9
Countries citing papers authored by Erik Stenius
This map shows the geographic impact of Erik Stenius's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erik Stenius with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erik Stenius more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Erik Stenius
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erik Stenius. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erik Stenius. The network helps show where Erik Stenius may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Erik Stenius, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1969 | 92 | |
| 2 | 1961 | 90 | |
| 3 | 1967 | 84 | |
| 4 | 1971 | 40 | |
| 5 | 1966 | 32 | |
| 6 | 1974 | 15 | |
| 7 | 1976 | 10 | |
| 8 | 1982 | 9 | |
| 9 | 1963 | 7 | |
| 10 | 1965 | 5 | |
| 11 | 1970 | 3 | |
| 12 | 1951 | 3 | |
| 13 | 1984 | 3 | |
| 14 | 1970 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1968 | 2 | |
| 16 | 1969 | 2 | |
| 17 | 1975 | 2 | |
| 18 | 1973 | 2 | |
| 19 | 1976 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1978 | 2 |
About Erik Stenius
Erik Stenius is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Language and Linguistics, Artificial Intelligence and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 414 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications (6 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (3 papers), Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (3 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (3 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (3 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (2 papers), Linguistic research and analysis (2 papers) and Philosophy and Theoretical Science (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (202 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (167 citations), Language and Linguistics (125 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (50 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (9 citations). Erik Stenius has collaborated with scholars based in Finland. Frequent co-authors include Newton Garver, Rush Rhees, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Irving M. Copi, James C. Morrison, G. H. von Wright, G. D. Duthie and Frank Plumpton Ramsey. Their work appears in journals such as Theoria, The Philosophical Review, The Philosophical Quarterly, dialectica and Synthese.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.