G. H. von Wright
Impact in
- Philosophy top 1%
- Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
Papers in
-
- Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications 4
-
- Historical Linguistics and Language Studies 1
- Co-authors
- Ludwig Wittgenstein (7 shared papers)G. E. M. Anscombe (4 shared papers)Courtney Luckhardt (2 shared papers)Maximilian A. E. Aue (2 shared papers)Heikki Nyman (2 shared papers)Cora Diamond (1 shared paper)James C. Edwards (1 shared paper)Rush Rhees (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Philosophical Quarterly (5 papers)The Philosophical Review (2 papers)The Journal of Philosophy (1 paper)Noûs (1 paper)Medical Entomology and Zoology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- FinlandUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
G. H. von Wright
9 papers receiving 395 citations
G. H. von Wright's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Philosophy 258
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 184
- General Psychology 12
- History and Philosophy of Science 36
- Cognitive Neuroscience 89
Countries citing papers authored by G. H. von Wright
This map shows the geographic impact of G. H. von Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. H. von Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. H. von Wright more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by G. H. von Wright
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. H. von Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. H. von Wright. The network helps show where G. H. von Wright may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 16 scholars most cited alongside G. H. von Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Remarks on the Philosophy of Psychology. Hit paper breakdown → | 1984 | 433 |
| 2 | 1975 | 25 | |
| 3 | 1976 | 25 | |
| 4 | 1979 | 20 | |
| 5 | 1988 | 5 | |
| 6 | 1963 | 3 | |
| 7 | 1975 | 1 | |
| 8 | 1982 | 1 | |
| 9 | The illustrated handbook of sporting terms | 1978 | 1 |
| 10 | Rand McNally illustrated dictionary of sports | 1979 | 1 |
| 11 | 1971 | 0 |
About G. H. von Wright
G. H. von Wright is a scholar working on Philosophy, Language and Linguistics, Infectious Diseases, Organic Chemistry and Surgery, having authored 11 papers that have together received 515 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications (4 papers) and Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (258 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (184 citations), General Psychology (12 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (36 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (89 citations). G. H. von Wright has collaborated with scholars based in Finland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ludwig Wittgenstein, G. E. M. Anscombe, Courtney Luckhardt, Maximilian A. E. Aue, Heikki Nyman, Cora Diamond, James C. Edwards, Rush Rhees, Laurence Goldstein and Anthony Kenny. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Quarterly, The Philosophical Review, The Journal of Philosophy, Noûs and Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.