Erich Bohl

897 citations
63 papers · 709 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Erich Bohl

58 papers receiving 639 citations

Peers

Erich Bohl
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Numerical Analysis 182
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 232
  • Modeling and Simulation 49
  • Applied Mathematics 110
  • Mathematical Physics 92
Replace Josephus Hulshof with:
Josephus Hulshof Netherlands
Messoud Efendiev Germany
Changchun Liu China
W. A. Day United Kingdom
Danielle Hilhorst France
Renate Schaaf United States
Hans‐Jürgen Schmeißer Germany
Eun‐Jae Park South Korea
K. Zacharias Germany
S. De Lillo Italy
Erich Bohl relative to Josephus Hulshof Netherlands Josephus Hulshof's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Josephus Hulshof · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Erich Bohl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Erich Bohl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erich Bohl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erich Bohl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Erich Bohl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erich Bohl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erich Bohl. The network helps show where Erich Bohl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Erich Bohl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Erich Bohl Line = papers co-authored together Erich Bohl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 63 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200189
2 199674
3 197470
4 199553
5 198150
6 199542
7 198533
8 201320
9 198620
10 196618
11 196417
12 197914
13 199714
14 197913
15 199310
16 199510
17 19918
18 19688
19 19918
20 19767

About Erich Bohl

Erich Bohl is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Numerical Analysis, Mathematical Physics and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 63 papers that have together received 709 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Matrix Theory and Algorithms (12 papers), Gene Regulatory Network Analysis (9 papers), Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation (8 papers), Numerical methods for differential equations (7 papers), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (5 papers), Stability and Controllability of Differential Equations (4 papers), Numerical methods in inverse problems (4 papers) and Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Numerical Analysis (182 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (232 citations), Modeling and Simulation (49 citations), Applied Mathematics (110 citations) and Mathematical Physics (92 citations). Erich Bohl has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Czechia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Winfried Boos, Howard A. Shuman, Johannes Schropp, Ivo Marek, Philipp Maass, W. Dieterich, Bernd Rinn, Peter Lancaster, Klaus Kirchgässner and Jens Lorenz. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Theoretical Biology, Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, Numerische Mathematik and Aequationes Mathematicae.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact