Eric Wasserman

5 papers receiving 787 citations

Eric Wasserman's Hit Papers

Chemical Topology1 1961 · 507 citations
5070+21+43Years since publication100200300400500

Peers

Eric Wasserman
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Organic Chemistry 345
  • Geometry and Topology 101
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 81
  • Spectroscopy 124
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 196
Replace H.J. Deuling with:
H.J. Deuling Germany
Lukas N. Wirz New Zealand
Antonio Rey Spain
C. Oguey France
Jian‐Ping Yu China
Zheng Yu Chen Canada
Xiangjun Xing China
David W. Allender United States
G. S. Ranganath India
Feng‐Yin Li Taiwan
Eric Wasserman relative to H.J. Deuling Germany H.J. Deuling's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×12.6×
H.J. Deuling · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eric Wasserman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eric Wasserman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eric Wasserman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eric Wasserman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eric Wasserman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eric Wasserman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eric Wasserman. The network helps show where Eric Wasserman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Eric Wasserman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eric Wasserman Line = papers co-authored together Eric Wasserman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

5 of 5 papers shown

About Eric Wasserman

Eric Wasserman is a scholar working on Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Mathematical Physics, Environmental Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, having authored 5 papers that have together received 827 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions (1 paper), CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts (1 paper), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (1 paper), Biochemical and Structural Characterization (1 paper), Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion (1 paper), Plant and animal studies (1 paper), High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior (1 paper) and Various Chemistry Research Topics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (345 citations), Geometry and Topology (101 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (81 citations), Spectroscopy (124 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (196 citations). Eric Wasserman has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include H. L. Frisch, Antonino Marco Saitta, Michael Lawrence Klein, Paul D. Soper, Stuart G. Whittington, Esaias J Janse van Rensburg, Robert L. Kornegay, Benjamin Rudshteyn, Michael D. Hopkins and Richard May. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Nature, ACS Catalysis, The Journal of Organic Chemistry and Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact