E.O. Schild

668 citations
14 papers · 518 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

E.O. Schild

14 papers receiving 385 citations

Peers

E.O. Schild
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 123
  • Communication 51
  • Education 140
  • Social Psychology 75
  • Computer Science Applications 21
Replace Charles Weingartner with:
Charles Weingartner United States
Rudolf Franz Flesch
M. Ray Loree United States
Ėvalʹd Vasilʹevich Ilʹenkov
Bruce W. Speck United States
Constance A. Mellon United States
Pamela Lomax United Kingdom
David L. DeVries United States
Mary E. Diez United States
Vivienne Collinson United States
E.O. Schild relative to Charles Weingartner United States Charles Weingartner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Charles Weingartner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E.O. Schild

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E.O. Schild's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E.O. Schild with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E.O. Schild more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E.O. Schild

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E.O. Schild. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E.O. Schild. The network helps show where E.O. Schild may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside E.O. Schild, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E.O. Schild Line = papers co-authored together E.O. Schild links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 1973281
2 196249
3 197849
4 197339
5 196126
6 196615
7 198214
8 196012
9 196011
10 196610
11 19714
12 19664
13 19563
14 19711

About E.O. Schild

E.O. Schild is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Communication, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Artificial Intelligence and Education, having authored 14 papers that have together received 518 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Educational Games and Gamification (3 papers), Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (2 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (2 papers), Social Media and Politics (2 papers), Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (2 papers), Social and Cultural Dynamics (1 paper), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (1 paper) and Community Health and Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (123 citations), Communication (51 citations), Education (140 citations), Social Psychology (75 citations) and Computer Science Applications (21 citations). E.O. Schild has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Israel. Frequent co-authors include James S. Coleman, Sarane Spence Boocock, Simon N. Herman, Vered Kraus, Robert W. Hodge, Daniel Kahneman, Julian C. Stanley, Mona Kyndi Pedersen and Kaare Svalastoga. Their work appears in journals such as Social Forces, Human Relations, American Journal of Sociology, Journal of Social Issues and American Behavioral Scientist.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact