Ena Španić

9 papers receiving 481 citations

Ena Španić's Hit Papers

Understanding Emotions: Origins and Roles of the Amygdala 2021 · 286 citations
2860+1+3Years since publication50100150200250

Peers

Ena Španić
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Biological Psychiatry 29
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 31
  • Neurology 67
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 103
  • Developmental Neuroscience 20
Replace Doaa H. Hewedi with:
Doaa H. Hewedi Egypt
Craig T. Vollert United States
Grace J. Lee United States
Yanbin Jia China
Tetsufumi Kanazawa Japan
Jonathan S. Thacker Canada
Daniel Shikanai Kerr Brazil
Juan Zhao China
Ya Luo China
Dana Kilroy Ireland
Ena Španić relative to Doaa H. Hewedi Egypt Doaa H. Hewedi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Doaa H. Hewedi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ena Španić

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ena Španić's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ena Španić with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ena Španić more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ena Španić

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ena Španić. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ena Španić. The network helps show where Ena Španić may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ena Španić, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ena Španić Line = papers co-authored together Ena Španić links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1
Understanding Emotions: Origins and Roles of the Amygdala
Hit paper breakdown →
2021286
2 201974
3 202241
4 201926
5 202223
6 202119
7 202213
8 20227
9 20225

About Ena Španić

Ena Španić is a scholar working on Neurology, Physiology, Molecular Biology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Genetics, having authored 9 papers that have together received 494 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (4 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (3 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (2 papers), Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research (1 paper), Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding (1 paper), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (1 paper), Inflammasome and immune disorders (1 paper) and Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (29 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (31 citations), Neurology (67 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (103 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (20 citations). Ena Španić has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Croatia and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Goran Šimić, Patrick R. Hof, Vana Vukić, Damir Mulc, Francisco E. Olucha‐Bordonau, Marina Šagud, Mladenka Tkalčić, Mario Vukšić, Katarina Ilić and Nela Pivac. Their work appears in journals such as CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics, Biomedicines, Progress in molecular biology and translational science, The Journal of Comparative Neurology and Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact