Emmanuelle Lévesque

17 papers receiving 251 citations

Peers

Emmanuelle Lévesque
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 84
  • Health Informatics 4
  • Genetics 76
  • Physiology 44
  • Oncology 43
Replace Rebekah McWhirter with:
Rebekah McWhirter Australia
Annika Gompers United States
Annique Claringbould Netherlands
Marcel Ramos United States
Deborah Goodman United States
Bege Dauda United States
Jasper Bovenberg Netherlands
Pilar Fraile Gómez Spain
Sandrine de Montgolfier France
Ida Ngueng Feze Canada
Emmanuelle Lévesque relative to Rebekah McWhirter Australia Rebekah McWhirter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.8×
Rebekah McWhirter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emmanuelle Lévesque

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emmanuelle Lévesque's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emmanuelle Lévesque with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emmanuelle Lévesque more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emmanuelle Lévesque

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emmanuelle Lévesque. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emmanuelle Lévesque. The network helps show where Emmanuelle Lévesque may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emmanuelle Lévesque, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emmanuelle Lévesque Line = papers co-authored together Emmanuelle Lévesque links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 201638
2 201237
3 201136
4 201634
5 201129
6 201917
7 201715
8 201814
9 201811
10 20119
11
RESEARCH ETHICS. Ethics review for international data-intensive research
20167
12 20105
13 20164
14 20224
15 20141
16 20151
17
Discrimination génétique et discrimination fondée sur le handicap comparaison internationale des différentes approches normatives
20051
18 20190

About Emmanuelle Lévesque

Emmanuelle Lévesque is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Genetics, Oncology, Economics and Econometrics and General Health Professions, having authored 18 papers that have together received 263 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in Clinical Research (8 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (5 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (5 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (2 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (2 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (2 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (84 citations), Health Informatics (4 citations), Genetics (76 citations), Physiology (44 citations) and Oncology (43 citations). Emmanuelle Lévesque has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Belgium and India. Frequent co-authors include Bartha Maria Knoppers, Jacques Simard, Kristien Hens, Kris Dierickx, Yann Joly, Stéphane Pouvreau, Gilles Le Moullac, Marcel Le Pennec, Edward S. Dove and Jasper Bovenberg. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics, Frontiers in Genetics, Public Health Genomics, New Genetics and Society and Human Genetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact