Emmanuel Matas

1.4k citations
16 papers · 1.1k · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Emmanuel Matas

16 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Emmanuel Matas
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Biological Psychiatry 77
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 86
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 430
  • Developmental Neuroscience 73
  • Genetics 427
Replace Janet Berrios with:
Janet Berrios United States
Hewlet G. McFarlane United States
Deanna Graham United States
Hala Harony‐Nicolas United States
Donna M. Werling United States
Michael C. Pride United States
Ciara Fahey Ireland
Pamela Sklar United States
Duyen T. Trang United States
Nélina Ramanantsoa France
Emmanuel Matas relative to Janet Berrios United States Janet Berrios's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Janet Berrios · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emmanuel Matas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emmanuel Matas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emmanuel Matas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emmanuel Matas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emmanuel Matas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emmanuel Matas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emmanuel Matas. The network helps show where Emmanuel Matas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emmanuel Matas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emmanuel Matas Line = papers co-authored together Emmanuel Matas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2015233
2 2018179
3 2019126
4 201996
5 201968
6 201863
7 201850
8 201649
9 201646
10 201345
11 201741
12 202137
13 202218
14 201612
15 202111
16 20124

About Emmanuel Matas

Emmanuel Matas is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Genetics, Molecular Biology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Social Psychology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (8 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (6 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (3 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (3 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (3 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (2 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (2 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (77 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (86 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (430 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (73 citations) and Genetics (427 citations). Emmanuel Matas has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Zhen Yan, Kaijie Ma, Jing Wei, Luye Qin, Zijun Wang, Jia Cheng, Lara J. Duffney, Zihua Hu, Mohamed Jaber and Anaïs Balbous. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular Psychiatry, Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry, Molecular Autism, Translational Psychiatry and Biomolecules.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact